Scientific management

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 97, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 4-8

  Nelson, Robert H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE;

EID: 0033382921     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. CLAWSON, M. 1976. The national forests. Science Februar)' 20:766.
2. DLVAI.I, B., and G. SESSIONS. 1985. Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Books.
3. CENTRAL ACCOLJNTINC OFFICE (CAO). 1994. Ecosystem management: Additional actions needed to adequately test a promising approach. Washington, DC.
4. HAyS, S.P. 1959. Conservation and the gospel of 'efficiency: The progressive conservation movement, 1890-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. KRUTH.LA, J. 1979. Adaptive responses (o forces for change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Foresters, Boston, MA, October 16, 1979.
6. LEE, E.W. 1995. Political science, public administration, and the rise of the American administrative state. Public Administration Review November/December: 539-43.
7. McPHEE, J. 1971. Encounters with the archdruid. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
8. NELSON, R.H. 1991. Reaching for heaven on earth: The theological meaning of 'economics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
9. O'TooiE, R. 1997. Expect the Forest Service to be slowly emasculated. The Seattle Times, May 7.
10. PlNCHOT, G. 1967. Tle fight for conservation. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
11. SEDJO, R.A. 1998. Forest Service vision: or, Docs the Forest Service have a future? Discussion Paper 99-03. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
12. WALDO, D. 1984. Isted. 1948. The administrative SIM: A study of the political theory of American p'Mic administration. New York: Holmes and Meier.