The bootstrapped ordination re-examined

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 895-902

  Pillar, Valério DePatta ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dimensionality; Eigenvalue; Metric ordination; Multidimensional scaling; Multivariate; Principal coordinates analysis; Procrustes; Resampling; Sample size; Stopping rule

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; ORDINATION;

EID: 0033381827     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3237314     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Digby, P.C.N. & Kempton, R.A. 1987. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman & Hall, London.
2. Efron, B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Statist. 7: 1-25.
3. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London.
4. Frontier, S. 1976. Étude de la decroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyze en composantes principales: comparison avec le modèle de baton brisé. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25: 67-75.
5. Ganeshanandam, S. & Krzanowski, W.J. 1990. Error-rate estimation in two-group discriminant analysis using linear discriminant function. J. Statist. Comp. Simul. 36: 157-175.
6. Grossman, G.D., Nickerson, D.M. & Freeman, M.C. 1991. Principal components analyses of assemblage structure data: utility of tests based on eigenvalues. Ecology 72: 341-347.
7. Jackson, D.A. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74: 2204-2214.
8. Jackson, D.A. 1995. Bootstrapped principal components analysis - reply to Mehlman et al. Ecology 76: 644-645.
9. Kendall, M. & Gibbons, J.D. 1990. Rank correlation methods, 5th ed. Edward Arnold, London.
10. Kenkel, N.C. & Orlóci, L. 1986. Applying metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies: some new results. Ecology 67: 919-928.
11. Knox, R.G. 1989. Effects of detrending and rescaling on correspondence analysis: solutions on stability and accuracy. Vegetatio 83: 129-136.
12. Knox, R.G. & Peet, R.K. 1989. Bootstrapped ordination: a method for estimating sampling effects in indirect gradient analysis. Vegetatio 80: 153-165.
13. Mehlman, D.W., Shepherd, U.L. & Kelt, D.A. 1995. Bootstrapping principal components analysis - a comment. Ecology 76: 640-643.
14. Økland, R.H. 1999. On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 131-136.
15. Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research, 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague.
16. Orlóci, L. 1993. The complexities and scenarios of ecosystem analysis. In: Patil, G.P. & Rao, C.R. (eds.) Multivariate environmental statistics, pp. 423-432. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
17. Pielou, E.C. 1984. The interpretation of ecological data. a primer on classification and ordination. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
18. Pillar, V.D. 1998. Sampling sufficiency in ecological surveys. Abstr. Bot. 22: 37-48.
19. Pillar, V.D., Jacques, A.V.A. & Boldrini, I.I. 1992. Fatores de ambiente relacionados à variação de vegetação de um campo natural. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 27: 1089-1101.
20. Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics. SPB. The Hague.
21. Schönemann, P.H. & Carroll, R.M. 1970. Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika 35: 245-256.
22. Stauffer, D.F., Garton, E.O. & Steinhorst, R.K. 1985. A comparison of principal components from real and random data. Ecology 66: 1693-1698.