Eutrophication impacts of wetland vegetation in floodplain on butterfly (Lepidoptera) biodiversity;Impacts de l'eutrophisation de la vegetation des zones humides de fonds de vallees sur la biodiversite des rhopaloceres (Lepidoptera)

Vie et Milieu

Volumn 49, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 107-116

  Van Es, J ^a   Paillisson, J M ^a   Burel, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

A gricultural landscape; Biodiversity; Butterflies; Eutrophication; Lepidoptera; Vegetation; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; EUTROPHICATION;

LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; URTICA;

EID: 0033380695     PISSN: 02408759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. e éd., Masson.
2. Braun-Blanquet J 1965. Plant sociology. The study of plant communities. Hafner Publishing Compagny, New York London.
3. Burel F, Baudry J, Butet A, Clergeau P, Delettre Y, Le Cœur D, Dubs F, Morvan N, Paillat G, Petit S, Thenail C, Brunel E, Lefeuvre JC 1998. Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes. Acta Oecologica 19 (1) : 47-60.
4. Clement B, Maltby E 1996. Quelques facteurs de la biodiversité végétale dans les prairies humides des corridors fluviaux. Acta bot Gallica 143 : 309-316.
5. De Foucault B 1984. Systémique, structuralisme et synsystémique des prairies hygrophiles des plaines atlantiques françaises. Thèse d'Etat, Tome 1, Université de Rouen.
6. Dennis RLH 1992. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford Science publications.
7. Dennis RLH, Williams WR, Shreeve TG 1991. A multivariate approach to the determination of faunal structures among an European butterfly species (Lepidoptera : Rhopalocera). Zool J Linn Soc Lond 101 : 1-49.
8. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Williams WR 1995. Taxonomic differenciation in species richness gradients among European butterflies (Papilionidae, Hesperidae) : contribution of macroevolutionary dynamics. Ecography 18 : 27-40.
9. Dover JW 1989. A method for recording and transcribing observations of butterfly behaviour. Entomologist's Gaz 40: 283-291.
10. Dover JW 1994. Arable field margins : factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance. In BCPC Monograph, 58 : Field margins : integrating agriculture and conservation : 59-66.
11. Erhardt A 1985. Day-active Lepidoptera : sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22 : 841-861.
12. Erhardt A 1989. Impact of grassland management on diurnal Lepidoptera in the swiss central Alps. In Future of butterflies in Europe : strategies for survival. Edited by T Pavlicek-van Beek, AH Ovaa and JG van der Made, Agricult Univ Wageningen : 146-155
13. Erhardt A, Thomas CD 1991. Lepidoptera as indicators of changes in the semi-natural grasslands of Lowland and Upland Europe. In The conservation of insects and their habitats. 15th symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 14-15 sept. 1989. Edited by NM Collins and JA Thomas, Academic press : 217-236.
14. Feber RE, Smith H 1995. Butterfly conservation in the landscape. In BCPC Monograph, 58 : Field margins : integrating agriculture and conservation : 31-40.
15. Forman RTT 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol 10 : 133-142.
16. Gates MR 1995. Butterfly conservation within the management of grassland habitats. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Edited by AS Pullin. Chapman Hall : 98-112.
17. Gounot M 1969. Méthodes d'étude quantitative de la végétation. Masson.
18. Higgins LG, Hargraeves B, Lhonoré J 1991. Guide complet des papillons d'Europe et d'Afrique du Nord, Delachaux et Niestlé.
19. Johnston CA 1991. Sediment and nutrient retention in freshwater wetlands : effects on surface quality. Crit Rev Environ Contr 21 : 491-565.
20. Knowles R 1981. Denitrification. Ecol Bull 33 : 315-329.
21. e éd., Masson et presses de l'Université du Québec.
22. McAdam JH, Bell AC, Henry T 1994. Field margin flora and fauna changes in response to grassland management practices. In BCPC Monograph, 58 : Field margins : integrating agriculture and conservation : 153-160.
23. Paillisson JM 1995. Biodiversité et paysages ruraux : le cas des Rhopalocères. Mémoire DEA, Univ. Rennes I.
24. Pinay G, Decamps H 1988. The role of riparian river woods in regulating nitrogen fluxes between the alluvial aquifer and surface water : a conceptuel model. Regulated Rivers 2 : 507-516.
25. Pinay G, Roques L, Fabre A 1993. Spatial and temporal patterns of denitrification in a river riparian forest. J Appl Ecol 30 : 581-591.
26. Pollard E 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12 : 115-134.
27. Pollard E, Yates TJ 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman & Hall.
28. Pollard E, Eversham BC 1995. Butterfly monitoring 2 - interpreting the changes. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Edited by AS Pullin, Chapman & Hall : 23-36.
29. Squires VR 1982. Dietary overlap between sheep, cattle and goats when grazing in common. J Range Manage 35 : 116-119.
30. e cycle Univ. Rennes I.
31. Tolman T, Lewington R 1997. Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Collins Field.
32. e cycle Univ. Aix-Marseille III.
33. Wilson PJ 1994. Botanical diversity in arable field margins. In BCPC Monograph, 58 : Field margins integrating agriculture and conservation : 75-83.