Predicting ecotoxicology of organophosphorous insecticides: Successful parameter selection with the genetic function algorithm

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 573-583

  Drew, Michael G B ^a   Lumley, James A ^a   Price, Nicholas R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b DEFRA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conformational analysis; MFA; Organophosphorous insecticides; QSAR

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; INSECTICIDES; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TOXICITY;

CONFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS; CV VALUE; DESCRIPTORS; ECO-TOXICOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL VALUES; GENETIC FUNCTION APPROXIMATIONS; MFA; ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS; ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS INSECTICIDE; QSAR;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

INSECTICIDE; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUND;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; GENE FUNCTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033380007     PISSN: 09318771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3838(199912)18:6<573::AID-QSAR573>3.0.CO;2-J     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fukuto, T.R. and Metcalf, R.L., Structure and Insecticidal Activity of Some Diethyl Substituted Phenyl Phosphates. Agr. and Food Chemistry 4, 930-935 (1956); Fukuto, T.R. and Metcalf, R.L. Meta-sulfurpentafluorophenylDiethylPhosphate and Meta-sulfurpentafluorophenyl N-methylcarbamate as Insecticides and Anticholinesterases. J. Econ. Entomology 55, 340-341 (1962).
2. Fukuto, T.R. and Metcalf, R.L., Structure and Insecticidal Activity of Some Diethyl Substituted Phenyl Phosphates. Agr. and Food Chemistry 4, 930-935 (1956); Fukuto, T.R. and Metcalf, R.L. Meta-sulfurpentafluorophenylDiethylPhosphate and Meta-sulfurpentafluorophenyl N-methylcarbamate as Insecticides and Anticholinesterases. J. Econ. Entomology 55, 340-341 (1962).
3. Relimpo, A.M., Structure and Anticholinesterase Activity of Series of Ethyl Substituted Phenyl Methylphosphonates. Z. Naturforsch 32c, 760-7645 (1977).
4. De Bruijn, J. and Hermens, J., Inhibition of Acetylcholinesterase and Acute Toxicity of Organophosphorous Compounds to Fish: a Preliminary Structure-Activity Analysis. Aquatic Toxicology 24, 257-274 (1993).
5. De Bruijn, J. and Hermens, J., Uptake and Elimination Kinetics of Organophosphorous Pesticides in the Guppy (Poecilia Reticulata): Correlations with the Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. Env. Toxicol. and Chem., 10, 791-804, (1991).
6. Schüürmann, G, QSAR Analysis of the Acute Fish Toxicity of Organic Phosphorothionates Using Theoretically Derived Molecular Descriptors. Env. Toxicol. and Chem. 9, 417-428 (1990).
7. Chambers, J.E. and Yardbrough, J.D., Xenobiotic Biotransformation Systems in Fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 55C, 77-84, (1976).
8. Takimoto, Y., Ohshima, M. and Yamada, H., Fate of Fenitrothion in Several Developmental Stages of the Killifish (Ozyrias Latipes). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13, 579-587, (1984).
9. Takimoto, Y., Ohshima, M. and Miyamoto J., Comparative Metabolism of Fenitrothion in Aquatic Organisms. I. Metabolism in the Euryhaline Fish, Oryzias Latipes and Mugil Cephalua. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 13, 104-117, (1987).
10. Corbitt, J.R., Biochemical Mode of Action of Pesticides, Academic Press, London, 1974.
11. Cambridge Structural Database System, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK.
12. Quanta 97, July 1997, San Diego, Molecular Simulations Inc.
13. Frisch, M.J., Trucks, G.W., Schlegel, H.B., Gill, P.M.W., Johnson, B.G., Robb, M.A., Cheeseman, J.R., Keith, T., Petersson, G.A., Montgomery, J.A., Raghavachari, K., Al-Laham, M.A., Zakrzewski, V.G., Ortiz, J.V., Foresman, J.B., Cioslowski, J., Stefanov, B.B., Nanayakkara, A., Challacombe, M., Peng, C.Y., Ayala, P.Y., Chen, W., Wong, M.W., Andres, J.L., Replogle, E.S., Gomperts, R., Martin, R.L., Fox, D.J., Binkley, J.S., Defrees, D.J., Baker, J., Stewart, J.R., Head-Gordon, M., Gonzalez, C. and Pople, J.A., Gaussian94, Revision E.1, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1995.
14. 2, Dec. 1997, San Diego, Molecular Simulations Inc.
15. Tsar V2.4, Oxford Molecular Ltd., Magdalen Centre, Oxford Science Park, Standford-on-Thames, Oxford, OX4 4GA, England.
16. Rogers, D. and Hopfinger, A.J., Application of Genetic Function Approximation to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34, 854-866, (1994).
17. Dunn, W.J. and Rogers, D., Genetic algorithms in molecular modelling: Genetic partial least squares in QSAR. Academic Press, London 1996. pp. 109-130.
18. Cramer III, R.D., Bunce, J.D. and Patterson, D.E., Cross-validation, Bootstrapping, and PLS compared with multiple linear regression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant. Struc.-Act. Relat. 7, 18-25, (1998).
19. Cramer, III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., Comparative Molecular Field Analysis. 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 110, 5959-5967 (1988).
20. Schmelzer, S., Greenidge, P., Kovar, K-A., Schulze-Alexandru, M. and Folkers, G., Structure-activity relationships of cannabinoids: A joint CoMFA and pseudoreceptor modelling study. J. Comp. Aided Mol. Design 11, 278 (1997).
21. Topliss, J.G. and Edwards, R.P., Chance factors in studies of QSAR. J. Med. Chem. 22, 10, 1238 (1979).
22. Wold, S. and Eriksson, L., Statistical Validation of QSAR results. in: Waterbeemd van de, H., (Ed.), Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design, Vol. 2, VCH, Weinheim 1995, pp. 309-318.
23. Eriksson, L. and Johansson, E., Multivariate Design and Modelling in QSAR. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 34, 1-19 (1996).