Comparison of 18-lead ECG and selected body surface potential mapping leads in determining maximally deviated ST lead and efficacy in detecting acute myocardial ischemia during coronary occlusion

Journal of Electrocardiology

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL., 1999, Pages 30-37

  Wung, Shu Fen ^a,b   Drew, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

18 lead ECG; Acute myocardial ischemia; Body surface potential mapping; ST segment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; ST SEGMENT DEPRESSION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

EID: 0033379475     PISSN: 00220736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0736(99)90032-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Krucoff MW, Parente AR, Pottner RK, et al: Stability of multilead ST-segment "fingerprints" over time after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and its usefulness in detecting reocclusion. Am J Cardiol 61:1232, 1988
2. Zalenski RJ, Rydman RJ, Sloan EP, et al: Value of posterior and right ventricular leads in comparison to the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in evaluation of ST segment elevation in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 79:1579, 1997
3. Kornreich F, Rautaharju PM, Warren J, et al: Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing myocardial infarction by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. Am J Cardiol 56:852, 1985
4. Montague T, Smith ER, Spencer A, et al: Body surface electrocardiographic mapping in inferior myocardial infarction: manifestation of left and right ventricular involvement. Circulation 67:665, 1983
5. Kornreich F, Montague TJ, Rautaharju PM: Body surface potential mapping of ST segment changes in acute myocardial infarction: implications for BCG enrollment criteria for thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 87:773, 1993
6. Kronreich F: Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing acute myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol 31(Suppl):157, 1998
7. Krucoff MW, Pope JE, Bottner RK, et al: Computerassisted ST-segment monitoring: experience during and after brief coronary occlusion. J Electrocardiol 20 (suppl):15, 1987
8. Elashoff J: nQuery Advisory Version 3.0 User's Guide. Statistical Solutions Ltd., Boston, 1999
9. Forman MB, Goodin J, Phelan B, et al: Electrocardiographic changes associated with isolated right ventricular infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 4:640, 1984
10. Isner JM, Roberts WC: Right ventricular infarction complicating left ventricular infarction secondary to coronary artery disease: frequency, location, associated findings and significance from analysis of 236 necropsy patients with acute or healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 42:885, 1978
11. Ratliff NB, Hackel DB: Combined right and left ventricular infarction: pathogenesis and clinicopathologic correlations. Am J Cardiol 45:217, 1980
12. 9: the 15-lead ECG. Ann Emerg Med 22:786, 1993
13. Brady WJ, Chang N, Hwang V, et al: The 15-lead ECG in emergency department chest pain patients: comparison to the 12-lead ECG. Acad Emerg Med 30:381, 1997
14. Pollack M, Thomason G, Williams M, et al: Emergency department diagnosis of acute posterior-wall myocardial infarction using left posterior chest leads. Acad Emerg Med 34:399, 1997
15. 9) in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Can Med Assoc J 119:745, 1978
16. Kulkarni AU, Brown R, Ayoubi M, et al: Clinical use of posterior electrocardiographic leads: a prospective electrocardiographic analysis during coronary occlusion. Am Heart J 131:736, 1996
17. Agarwal J: Routine use of a 15-lead electrocardiogram for patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. J Electrocardiol 31(suppl): 172, 1998
18. Agarwal J, Khaw K, Aurignac F, et al: Importance of posterior chest leads in patients with suspected myocardial infarction, but nondiagnostic, routine 12-lead electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol 83:323, 1999