Mental representation of knowledge following frontal-lobe lesion: Dissociations on tasks using scripts

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 643-665

  Allain, Philippe ^a   Le Gall, Didier ^a   Etcharry Bouyx, Frédérique ^a   Aubin, Ghislaine ^a   Emile, Jean ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISORIENTATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0033378670     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.21.5.643.871     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abbott, V., Black, J.B., & Smith, E.E. (1985). The representation of scripts in memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 179-189.
2. Aubin, G. (1997). Résolution de problèmes numériques et syndromes frontaux [Numerical problem solving and frontal lobe syndrome]. Unpublished thesis. Université Claude Bernard: Lyon I.
3. Aubin, G., Le Gall, D., & Guyard, H. (1994). Etude de la résolution de problèmes numériques chez des patients frontaux [Study of numerical problem solving in frontal brain-damaged patients]. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 4, 437-467.
4. Bower, G.H., Black, J.B., & Turner, T.J. (1979). Scripts in memory for texts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
5. Brazzelli, M., Colombo, N., Della Salla, S., & Spinnler, H. (1994). Spared and impaired cognitive abilities after bilateral frontal damage. Cortex, 30, 27-51.
6. Burgess, P.W., & Shallice, T. (1994). Fractionnement du syndrome frontal [Fractionation of the frontal lobe]. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 3, 345-370.
7. Burgess, P.W., & Shallice, T. (1996). Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 4, 263-273.
8. Coelho, C.A., Liles, B.Z., & Duffy, R.J. (1991). Analysis of conversational discourse in head injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6, 92-99.
9. Coelho, C.A., Liles, B.Z., & Duffy, R.J. (1995). Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 9, 471-477.
10. Corson, Y. (1990). The structure of scripts and their constituent elements. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 2, 157-183.
11. Crowe, S.F. (1992). Dissociation of two frontal lobe syndromes by a test of verbal fluency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2, 327-339.
12. Damasio, H., & Damasio, A.R. (1989). Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Della Malva, C.L., Stuss, D.T. D'Alton, J., & Willmer, J. (1993). Capture errors and sequencing after frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia, 4, 363- 372.
14. Eslinger, P.J., & Damasio, A.R. (1985). Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR. Neurology, 35, 1731- 1741.
15. Glantz, S.A., & Slinker, B.K. (1990). Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
16. Godbout, L., & Doyon, J. (1995). Mental representation of knowledge following frontal-lobe or postrolandic lesions. Neuropsychologia, 12, 1671- 1696.
17. Godefroy, O., & Rousseaux, M., (1996). Binary choice in patients with prefrontal or posterior brain damage. A relative judgement theory analysis. Neuropsychologia, 10, 1029-1038.
18. Goldstein, L., Bernard, S., Fenwick, P., Burgess, P., & McNelin, J. (1993). Unilateral lobectomy can produce strategy application disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurousrgery and Psychiatry, 56, 274-276.
19. Grafman, J. (1989). Plans, actions and mental sets: Managerial knowledge units in the frontal lobes. In E. Perecman (Ed.), Integrating theory andpractice in clinical neuropsychology (pp. 93-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Gross, R.D. (1992). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour (2nd ed.) London: Hodder & Stoughton.
21. Heck, E.T., & Bryer, J.B. (1986). Superior sorting and categorising ability in a case of bilateral frontal lobe atrophy: An exception to the rule. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 316-316.
22. Kaczmarek, B. (1984). Neurolinguistic analysis of verbal utterances in patients with focal lesions of frontal lobes. Brain and Language, 21, 52-58.
23. Kertesz, A. (1994). Frontal lesions and functions. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology (pp. 567-598). New York: Academic Press.
24. Kimberg, D.Y., & Farah, M.J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behaviour. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 411-428.
25. Le Gall, D., Aubin, G., Allain, P., & Emile, J. (1993a). Script et syndrome frontal: A propos de deux observations [Script and the frontal lobe syndrome:Two observations]. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 1, 87-110.
26. Le Gall, D., Aubin, G., Allain, P., Guyard, H. (1993b). Résolution de problèmes et manipulation des scripts: Contribution à la comprehension des syndromes frontaux [Numerical problem solving and script manipulation: contribution to comprehension of frontal lobe syndromes]. Tétralogiques, 8, 64-104.
27. Luria, A.R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed.) New-York: Basic Books.
28. Mayes, A.R. & Daum, I. (1997). How specific are the memory and other cognitive deficits caused by frontal lobe lesions? In P. Rabbit (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 155- 175). Hove: Psychology Press.
29. Mazaux, J.M. & Orgogozo, J.M. (1981). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination: Echelle Française. Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques, Issy-les-Moulinaux.
30. McDonald, S. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44, 28-46.
31. McDowell, S., Whyte, J., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury: evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 10, 1341-1353.
32. Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272-277.
33. Milner, B., Corsi, P., & Leonard, G. (1991). Frontal lobe contribution to recency judjements. Neuropsychologia, 29, 601-618.
34. Nelson, H.E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defect. Cortex, 12, 313-324.
35. Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T., (1980). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behaviour. CHIP report No. 99. San Diego, CA: University of California.
36. Novoa, O., & Ardila, A. (1987). Linguistic abilities in patients with prefrontal damage. Brain and Language, 30, 206-225.
37. Partiot, A., Grafman, J., Sadato, N., Flitman, S., & Wild, K. (1996). Brain activation during script event processing. NeuroReport, 7, 761-766.
38. Penfield, W., & Evans, J. (1935). The frontal lobe in man: A clinical study of maximun removals. Brain, 58, 115-133.
39. Petrides, M. (1994). Spécialisation fonctionnelle au sein du cortex frontal lateral [Functional specialization within the dorsolateral frontal cortex]. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 3, 305-325.
40. Reitan, R.M. (1958) Validity of the trail making test as an indication of brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271-276.
41. Robbins, T.W., James, M., Owen, A.M., Sahakian, B.J., McInnes, L., & Rabbitt, P. (1997). A neural system approach to the cognitive psychology of aging using the CANTAB battery. In P. Rabbit (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 215-238). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
42. Roman, M., Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., Seibold, M.S., & Gardner, H. (1987). Script knowledge in right hemisphere damage and in normal elderly adults. Brain and Language, 31, 151-170.
43. Samuelsson, H., Jensen, C., Ekholm, S., Naver, H., & Blomstrand, C. (1997). Anatomical and neurological correlates of acute and chronic visuospatial neglect following right hemisphere stroke. Cortex, 33, 271-285.
44. Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Schwartz, M.F., Reed, E.S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Palmer, C. (1991). The quantitative description of action desorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 381- 414.
46. Schwartz, M.F., Mayer, N.H., Fitzpatrick-Desalme, E.J., Montgomery, M., & Palmer, C. (1993). Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 59-72.
47. Schwartz, M.F., Montgomery, M., Fitzpatrick-Desalme, E.J., Ochipa, C., Coslett, H.B., & Mayer N.M. (1995). Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 863-892.
48. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. In D.E. Broadbent & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), The neuropsychology of cognitive functions (pp. 199- 209). London: The Royal Society.
49. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Shallice, T., & Burgess, P.W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727-741.
51. Sharkey, N.E., & Mitchell, D.C. (1985). Word recognition in a functional context: The use of scripts in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 253-270.
52. Shimamura, A.P., Janowsky, J.S., & Squire, L.R. (1990). Memory for the temporal order of events in patients with frontal lesions and amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia, 28, 803-813.
53. Sirigu, A., Zalla, T., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., Agid, Y., & Dubois, B. (1995). Selective impairements in managerial knowledge following pre-frontal cortex damage. Cortex, 31, 301-316.
54. Sirigu, A., Zalla, T., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., Agid, Y., & Dubois, B. (1996). Encoding of sequence and boundaries of scripts following prefrontal lesions. Cortex, 32, 297-310.
55. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interferences in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Neurology, 18, 643-662.
57. Stuss, D.T., Shallice, T., Alexander, M.P., & Picton, T.W. (1995). A multi-disciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. In J. Grafman, K. Hollyoack & F. Boller (Eds.), Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 279, 191-211.
58. Swain, S.A., Polkey, C.E., Bullock, P., & Morris, R.G. (1998). Recognition memory and memory for order in script-based stories following frontal lobe excisions. Cortex, 34, 25-45.
59. Truelle, J.L., Le Gall, D., Joseph, P.A., Aubin, G., Derouesné, C., & Lezak, M.D. (1995). Movements disturbances following frontal lobe lesions: Qualitative analysis. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, & 8, 1, 14-19.
60. Tucker, F.M., & Hanlon R.E. (1998). Effect of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse. Brain Injury, 9, 783-792.
61. Ulatowska, H.K., Freedman-Stern, R., Weiss Doyel, A., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & North, A.J. (1983). Production of procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 18, 315-341.
62. Vendrell, P., Carme, J., Pujol, J., Jurado, M.A., Molet, J., & Grafman, J. (1995). The role of the prefrontal regions in the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 3, 341-352.
63. Walker, C.H., & Yekovich, F.R. (1984). Script-based inferences: Effects of text and knowledge variables on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 357-370.