A role for stakeholder ethics in meeting the ethical challenges posed by managed-care organizations

HEC Forum

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 306-322

  Illingworth, Patricia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONFERENCE PAPER; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL ETHICS;

ADMINISTRATORS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BUSINESS ETHICS; CONTRACTS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED STATES;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONTRACTS; DECISION MAKING; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS; ETHICS, BUSINESS; ETHICS, INSTITUTIONAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; INVESTMENTS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033373272     PISSN: 09562737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008991515231     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Stone A. Meetings of the American Psychiatric Association, San Diego, CA; 1997.
2. Mariner W, Business vs. Medical Ethics: Conflicting standards for managed care. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 1995; 230:236-46.
3. Martin JA, Bjerknes LK. The Legal and Ethical Implications of Gag Clauses in Physician Contracts. American Journal of Law & Medicine. 1996; 22:433-76.
4. Morriem EH. Balancing Act: The New Medical Ethics of Medicines New Economics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1995.
5. Peery Jr. NS. Business, Government and Society. Saddle River,NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995.
6. Moore SF. Law as Process: An anthropological approach. London, UK/ Boston, MA; Routledge and K. Paul; 1978.
7. Rodwin M. Medicine Money & Morals: Physicians' conflicts of interest. New York, NY; Oxford University Press; 1993.
8. Moore v. Regent of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120-24 (1990).
9. Wickline v. State of California, 192 Cal. App 3d 1630 (1986).
10. American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current opinions with annotations. Chicago, IL: Southern Illinois University Schools of Medicine and Law; 1997.
11. Hillman A. Financial Incentives for Physicians in HMOs. New England Journal of Medicine. 1987; 317:1743-48.
12. Hillman A, Pauly MV, Kerstein JJ. How do Financial Incentives Affect Physicians' Clinical Decisions and the Financial Performance of Health Maintenance Organizations? New England Journal of Medicine. 1989; 319:86-92.
13. Scott RA, Aiken LH, Mechanic D, Moracsik J. Organizational Aspects of Caring. The Milbank Quarterly. 1995; 73(1):77-95.
14. Martin, J.A. Martin, Bjerknes, L.K., Hall M.A. Informed Consent to Rationing Decisions. The Milbank Quarterly. 1993; 71(4):645-67.
15. Corbin AL. Corbin on Contracts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.; 1952.
16. Black's Law Dictionary.
17. Mariner D, Leitner E, Managed Care Liability. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association; 1997.
18. Furrow BR, Greaney TL, Johnson SH, Jost TS, Schwartz RL. Health Law: Cases, materials and problems. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.; 1997.
19. Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. In Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds.). Ethical Theory and Business. 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.
20. Clark R. Agency Costs versus Fiduciary Duties. In Pratt W, Zeckhauser RJ (eds.). Principals and Agents: The structure of business. Boston, MA; Harvard Business School Press; 1985.
21. Nelson H. Nonprofit and For-Profit HMOs: Converging practices but different goals? New York, NY: Milbank Memorial Fund; 1997.
22. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., Supreme Court of Michigan, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (1919).
23. Health Care in America: Your Money or Your Life. The Economist. (7 March); 1998:23-26.
24. Freeman RE. A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation. In Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds.). Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.
25. Goodpastor KE. Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. In Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds.). Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.
26. Boatright JR, Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: Or, what's so special about shareholders? In Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds.). Ethical Theory and Business, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.
27. Orts EW. Beyond Shareholders: Interpreting corporate constituency statutes. George Washington Law Review. 1992; 61(1):14-135.
28. Romano R. What Is the Value of Other Constituency Statues to Shareholders? [Comment]. University of Toronto Law Journal. 1993; XLIII(3):533-42.
29. Millstein IM. The Responsible Board. The Business Lawyer. 1998; 52:407.
30. N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law §717(b) (McKinney Supp. 1991).
31. Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. §§33-313(e) (West Supp. 1992).
32. Revised Model Business Code §8.30(a)(1992).
33. Revised Model Business Code §4.01(c).
34. Hart O. An Economist's View of Fiduciary Duty. Univeristy of Toronto Law Journal. 1993; XLIII(3):299-315.
35. Daniels R. Stakeholders and Takeovers: Can contractarianism be compassionate? Univeristy of Toronto Law Journal. 1993; XLIII(3):331.