Bargaining over interconnection: The clear-telecom dispute

Economic Record

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 241-255

  Carter, Michael ^a   Wright, Julian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; PRIVATIZATION; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 0033370895     PISSN: 00130249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1999.tb02453.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Armstrong, M. (1998), 'Network interconnection in telecommunications', Economic Journal 108, 545-64.
2. Baumol, W. J. and Sidak, J.G. (1994), 'The pricing of inputs sold to competitors', Yale Journal on Regulation 11, 171-202.
3. Carter, M. and Wright, J. (1994), 'Symbiotic production: The case of telecommunication pricing', Review of Industrial Organization 9, 365-78.
4. _ and _ (1997), Bargaining over interconnection: the Clear-Telecom dispute, Working Paper No. 13, Centre for Research in Network Economics and Communications, University of Auckland.
5. _ and _ (1999), 'Interconnection in network industries', Review of Industrial Organization 14, 1-25.
6. Boles de Boer, D. and Evans, L (1996), 'The economic efficiency of telecommunications in a deregulated market: The case of New Zealand', Economic Record 72, 24-35.
7. Economides, N. and White, L. J. (1995), 'Access and interconnection pricing: how efficient is the 'efficient component pricing rule'?', The Antitrust Bulletin, Fall, 557-79.
8. Economides, N., Lopomo, G. and Woroch, G. (1996), Strategic Commitments and the Principle of Reciprocity in Interconnection Pricing, Discussion Paper no. EC-96-13, Stem School of Business, New York University.
9. Edlin, R. (1996), Regulating telecommunications: a comparison of trans-Tasman outcomes, Department of Economics, University of Canterbury, mimeo.
10. Ergas, H. (1995), Telecommunications across the Tasman: A Comparison of regulatory approaches and economic outcomes in Australia and New Zealand, Working Paper No. 10, Centre for Research in Network Economics and Communications, University of Auckland
11. Laffont, Jean-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. (1998), 'Network competition: I. Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing', RAND Journal of Economics 29, 1-37.
12. Nash, J. (1950), 'The bargaining problem', Econometrica 18, 155-62.
13. Osborne, M. J., and Rubinstein, A. (1990), Bargaining and markets, Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Pickford, M. (1996), 'Information disclosure, the Baumol-Willig rule, and the light-handed regulation of utilities in New Zealand', New Zealand Economic Papers 30, 199-218.
15. Tye, W. and Lapuerta, C. (1996), 'The Economics of Pricing Network Interconnection: Theory and Application to the Market for Telecommunications in New Zealand', Yale Journal on Regulation 13, 419-500.
16. Williams, P. L. (1995), Interconnection in local telephony: The implications of symmetry, paper presented to the Industry Economics Conference, University of Melbourne, 6-7 July.
17. Wright, J. (1999), 'International Telecommunications, Settlement Rates, and the FCC', Journal of Regulatory Economics, forthcoming.