Crop-yield and economic comparisons of organic, low-input, and conventional farming systems in California's Sacramento Valley

American Journal of Alternative Agriculture

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 109-121

  Clark, Sean ^b   Klonsky, Karen ^c   Livingston, Peter ^c   Temple, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BEREA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Alternative agriculture; Economic analysis; Sustainable agriculture

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COMPOST; CONVENTIONAL FARMING; CROP MANAGEMENT; CROP ROTATION; CROP YIELD; ECONOMICS; FARMING SYSTEM; INORGANIC FERTILIZER; LOW INPUT FARMING; MAIZE; MANURE; NITROGEN AVAILABILITY; ORGANIC FARMING; TOMATO; UNITED STATES; WEEDS;

CROP YIELD; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FARMING SYSTEM; ORGANIC FARMING; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO VALLEY; UNITED STATES;

CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0033368026     PISSN: 08891893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0889189300008225     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdul-Baki, A.A., J.R. Teasdale, R. Korcak, D.J. Chitwood, and R.N. Huettel. 1996. Fresh-market tomato production in a low-input alternative system using cover-crop mulch. Hort-Science 31:65-69.
2. Auburn, J.S. 1994. Society pressures farmers to adopt more sustainable systems. California Agric. 48(5):7-10.
3. Batie, S.S., and D.B. Taylor. 1989. Widespread adoption of non-conventional agriculture: Profitability and impacts. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 4:128-134.
4. Brumfield, R.G., F.E. Adelaja, and S. Reiners. 1995. Economic analysis of three tomato production systems. Acta Horticulturae 340:255-260.
5. CCOF. 1995. California Certified Organic Farmers Certification Handbook. California Certified Organic Farmers, Santa Cruz, CA.
6. California Department of Food and Agriculture. 1997. California Agricultural Resource Directory Including Agricultural Production and Export Statistics. Sacramento, CA.
7. California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 1996. Pesticide use reporting system. Cal-EPA, Sacramento, CA.
8. Cavero, J., R.E. Plant, C. Shennan, and D.B. Friedman. 1997. The effect of nitrogen source and crop rotation on the growth and yield of processing tomatoes. Nutrient Cycling in Agro-ecosystems 47:271-282.
9. Clark, M.S., H. Ferris, K. Klonsky, W.T. Lanini, A.H.C. van Bruggen, and F.G. Zalom. 1998a. Agronomic, economic, and environmental comparison of pest management in conventional and alternative tomato and corn systems in northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 68:51-71.
10. Clark, M. S., W. R. Horwath, C. Shennan, and K. M. Scow. 1998b. Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming practices. Agronomy J. 90:662-671.
11. Clark, M.S., W.R. Horwath, C. Shennan, K.M. Scow, W.T. Lanini, and H. Ferris. 1999. Nitrogen, weeds and water as yield-limiting factors in conventional, low-input, and organic tomato systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73:257-270.
12. Diebel, P.L., R.V. Llewelyn, and J.R. Williams. 1993. An economic analysis of conventional and alternative cropping systems for northeast Kansas. Agriculture Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Report of Progress 687.
13. Drinkwater, L.E, D.K. Letourneau, F. Workneh, A.H.C. van Bruggen, and C. Shennan. 1995. Fundamental difference between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecological Applications 5: 1098-1112.
14. Friedman, D.B., R.O. Miller, S.R. Temple, and T. Kearney. 1997. Low-input corn production yields good crop, better returns, and improved soil quality. Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems Project Newsletter 1(2):1-3.
15. Friedman, D.B., R.O. Miller, S.R. Temple, and T. Kearney. 1999. Agronomic performance of field corn in conventional, low-input and organic farming systems. Agronomy J. (in press).
16. Grieshop, J.I., and A.K. Raj. 1992. Are California's farmers headed toward sustainable agriculture? California Agric. 46(2):4-7.
17. Karlen, D.L., M.D. Duffy, and T.S. Colvin. 1995. Nutrient, labor, energy, and economic evaluations of two farming systems in Iowa. J. Production Agric. 8:540-546.
18. King, L.D., and D.L. Hoag. 1998. Reduced chemical input cropping systems in the southeastern United States: III. Economic analysis. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 13:12-27.
19. Klonsky, K., and D. Cary. 1990. Budget Planner Overview. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis.
20. Klonsky, K., and P. Livingston. 1994. Alternative systems aim to reduce inputs, maintain profits. California Agric. 48(5):34-42.
21. Klonsky, K., and L. Tourte. 1995. Statistical Review of California's Organic Agriculture 1992-1993. Cooperative Extension, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis.
22. Lanini, W.T., E.G. Zalom, J.J. Marois, and H. Ferris, 1994. In low-input and organic systems researchers find short-term insect problems, long-term weed problems. California Agric. 48(5):27-33.
23. Liebhardt, W.C., R.W. Andrews, M.N. Culik, R.R. Harwood, R.R. Janke, J.K. Radke, and S.L. Rieger-Schwartz. 1989. Crop production during conversion from conventional to low-input methods. Agronomy J. 81:150-159.
24. Lockeretz, W. 1989. Problems in evaluating the economics of ecological agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 27:67-75.
25. Lockeretz, W., G. Shearer, and D.H. Kohl. 1981. Organic farming in the Corn Belt. Science 211:540-547.
26. Mergentime, K., and M. Emerich. 1996. Widening market carries organic sales to $2.8 billion in 1995. Natural Foods Merchandiser 17(6): 36.
27. Nelson, J.B., and L.D. King. 1996. Green manure as a nitrogen source for wheat in the southeastern United States. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 11:182-189.
28. Pimentel, D. 1993. Economics and energetics of organic and conventional farming. J. Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6:53-60.
29. Scott, M. 1997. Organic sales still boom as new challenges surface. Natural Foods Merchandiser 18(6):38-40.
30. Scow, K.M., O. Somasco, N. Gunapala, S. Lau, R. Venette, H. Ferris, R. Miller, and C. Shennan. 1994. Transition from conventional to low-input agriculture changes soil fertility and biology. California Agric. 48(5):20-26.
31. Sellen, D., J.H. Tolman, D.G.R. McLeod, A. Weersink, and E.K. Yiridoe. 1995. A comparison of financial returns during early transition from conventional to organic vegetable production. J. Vegetable Crop Production 1:11-39.
32. Smolik, J.D., T.L. Dobbs, and D.H. Rickerl. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:25-35.
33. Smolik, J.D., T.L. Dobbs, D.H. Rickerl, L.J. Wrage, G.W. Buchenau, and T.A. Machacek. 1993. Agronomic, economic, and ecological relationships in alternative (organic), conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 718. South Dakota State University, Brookings.
34. Temple, S.R., D.B. Friedman, O. Somasco, H. Ferris, K. Scow, and K. Klonsky. 1994. An interdisciplinary experiment station-based participatory comparison of alternative crop management systems for California's Sacramento Valley. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 9:64-71.