Medpor motility coupling post: A rabbit model

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 190-201

  Choi, John C ^a,b,c,d,f   Iwamoto, Mami A ^b,d   Bstandig, Sabrina ^b   Rubin, Peter A D ^c   Shore, John W ^c,d,e  

^a Limberg Eye Surgery Inc   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^d OPHTHALMIC CONSULTANTS OF BOSTON   (United States)

^e Texas Oculoplastic Consultants   (United States)

^f NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL MODEL; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONJUNCTIVA DISEASE; EYE MOVEMENT; HISTOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORBIT IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE GROWTH; VASCULARIZATION;

EID: 0033361134     PISSN: 07409303     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002341-199905000-00009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;8:75-81.
2. Dutton JJ. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology 1991;98:370-7.
3. Cartwright MJ, Nelson CC. Drill guide for hycroxyapatite implants. Arch Ophthal 1994;112:272-3.
4. De Potter P, Shields CL, Shields JA, Singh AD. Use of hydroxyapatite ocular implant in the pediatric population. Arch Ophthal 1994;112:208-12.
5. Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P, Singh AD. Complications of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant in 250 cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1993;91:177-95.
6. Shields JA, Shields CL, De Potter P. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant after enucleation - experience with 200 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:1191-5.
7. Merriam JC, Rosskothen HD, Benedek E. Right-angled peg for hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthal Surg 1992;23:564.
8. Albiar E. Hydroxyapatite implants - a new trend in enucleation and orbital reconstructive surgery. Insight 1992; 17:25-8.
9. Rosen HM. The response of porous hydroxyapitite to contiguous tissue infection. Plast Reconstr Sing 1992;88: 1076-80.
10. Nunery WR, Heinz GW, Bonnin JM, et al. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: histologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;9:96-104.
11. Buettner H, Bartley GB. Tissue breakdown and exposure associated with orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:669-73.
12. Goldberg RA, Holds JB, Ebrahimpour J. Exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Report of six cases. Ophthalmology 1992;99:831-6.
13. Rosner M, Edward DP, Tso MO. Foreign-body giant-cell reaction to the hydroxyapalite orbital implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:173-4.
14. Rubin PAD, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;10:96-103.
15. Goldberg RA, Dresner SC, Braslow RA. Animal model of porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;10:104-9.
16. Uyemura MJ, Farris SR, Popham JK, et al. Drilling of a porous polyethylene orbital implant. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 1996(suppl);3:S617.
17. Villanueva AR, Lundin KD. A versatile new mineralized bone stain for simultaneous assessment of tetracycline and osteoid seams. Stain Technol 1989;64:129-37.
18. Spivey BE, Allen L, Burns CA. The Iowa enucleation implant. A 10-year evaluation of technique and results. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;10:689-711.
19. Soll DB. The anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmology 1982; 89:407-23.
20. Trouan RC. End results of implant surgery. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1952;56:30-4.
21. Atkins AD, Roper Hall MJ. Magnetic orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:315-6.
22. Verburg AD, Klopper PJ, van den Hooff A, et al. The healing of biologic and synthetic bone implants. An experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1988;107:293-300.
23. Muller-Mai CM, Vogit C, Gross U. Incorporation and degradation of hydroxyapatite implants of different surface roughness and surface structure in bone. Scanning Microsc 1990;4:613-24.