EM-based recursive estimation of channel parameters

IEEE Transactions on Communications

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1297-1302

  Zamiri Jafarian, Hossein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; KALMAN FILTERING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

EXPECTATION-MAXIMIZATION (EM) ALGORITHMS; RECURSIVE LEAST SQUARES (RLS);

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY);

EID: 0033359305     PISSN: 00906778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/26.789663     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin.Maximum-likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm..J. Roy. Stat. Soc., vol. 39, pp. 1-38, 1977.
2. T. K. Moon.The expectation-maximization algorithm..IEEE Signal Processing Mag., vol. 13, pp. 47-60, Nov. 1996.
3. M. Feder and E. Weinstein.Parameter estimation of superimposedsignal using the EM algorithm..IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 36, pp. 477189, .. 1988.
4. E. Weinstein, M. Feder, and A. Oppenheim.Sequential algorithm for parameter estimation based on the Kullback-Leibler information measure..IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 38, pp. 1652-1654, Sept. 1990.
5. E. Weinstein, A. Oppenheim, M. Feder, and J. R. Buck.Iterative andsequential algorithms for multisensor signal enhancement..IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 42, pp. 846-859, .Aug. 1994.
6. M. Segal and E. Weinstein.A new method evaluating the log-likelihood gradient, the Hessian, and the Fisher information matrix for linear dynamic systems..IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 35, pp. 682-687, ..May 1989.
7. V. Krishnamurthy and J. B. Moore.On-line estimation of hidden .Markov model parameters based on the Kullback-Leibler information measure..IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 41, pp. 2557-2573, .Aug. 1993.
8. V. Krishnamurthy.On-line estimation of dynamic shock-error models based on the Kullback-Leibler information measure..IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., pp. 1129-1135, ..May 1994.
9. R. H. Shumway and D. S. Stoffer.An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the em algorithm..J. Time Series Anal., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 253-264, 1982.
10. L. B. Nelson and H. V. Poor.Iterative multiuser receivers for CDMA channels: An EM-based approach..IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 44, pp. 1700-1710, Dec. 1996.
11. G. K. Kaleh and R. Vallet.Joint parameter estimation and symbol detection for linear or nonlinear unknown channels..IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, pp. 2406-2413, .July 1994.
12. C. N. Georghiades and J. C. Han.Sequence estimation in presence of random parameters via the EM algorithm..IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, pp. 300-308, .Mar. 1997.
13. L. Ljung and T. Soderstrom, Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. London, U.K.: The MIT Press, 1986.
14. D. M. Titterington.Recursive parameter estimation using incomplete data..J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 257-267, 1984.
15. H. Zamiri-Jafarian and S. Pasupathy.Adaptive MLSDE using the EM algorithm..IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, pp. 1181-1193, .July 1999.
16. S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
17. J. A. Fessier and A. O. Hero.Space-alternating generalized expectationmaximization algorithm..IEEE Trans. Signal Processsing, vol. 42, pp. 2664-2677, .Oct. 1994.
18. H. Zamiri-Jafarian.Adaptive MLSDE receivers for wireless communications. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Comp. Eng., Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 1998.