Investigation of dynamic fracture toughness (JId) behaviour of strength mis-matched Q & T steel weldments using instrumented Charpy impact testing

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 417-432

  Angamuthu, K ^a   Guha, B ^a   Achar, D R G ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Dynamic fracture; J integral; Mismatch; Welds

Indexed keywords

CRACK PROPAGATION; IMPACT TESTING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WELDED STEEL STRUCTURES; YIELD STRESS;

CHARPY IMPACT TESTING; MICROSTRUCTURAL MISMATCH;

FRACTURE TOUGHNESS;

EID: 0033341326     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(99)00093-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chen B.Y., Shi Y.H. A comparison of various dynamic elasto-plastic fracture toughness evaluating procedure by instrumented impact test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 36:(1):1990;17-26.
2. Schindler H.J. The use of instrumented impact testing on pre-cracked Charpy specimens in engineering integrity assessment. Van Walle E. Evaluating material properties by dynamic testing, ESIS 20. 1996;45-58 Mechanical Engineering Publications, London.
3. Macke Th, Martin E, Balette J.J., Quenisset J.M. Compliance calibration during instrumented Charpy impact testing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 37:(4):1990;831-838.
4. Kocak M, Schwalbe KH. Fracture of weld joints: Mis-match effect, GKSS 94/E/27 ISSN 0344-9629.
5. Burdekin FM, Kocak M, Schwalbe KH, Denys R. Significance of strength mis-match in welds - Summary of a round table discussion, GKSS 94/E/39 ISSN 0344-9629.
6. Petrovski B, Kocak M. Evaluation of the fracture behaviour of strength mis-matched steel weld joints with surface cracked tensile panels and SENB specimens, GKSS 94/E/41, ISSN 0344-9629.
7. Hao S, Cornec A, Schwalbe KH. On the crack driving force and constraint state in a mis-matched welded plate under tension, GKSS 94/E/43, ISSN 0344-9629.
8. Hornet P, Kocak M, Cornec A, Petrovski B, Schwalbe KH. Effect of weld metal mis-matching on crack driving force, GKSS 94/E/44, ISSN 0344-9629.
9. Denys R, Lefevre A, Kvaale PE, Lian B. Effects of weld metal matching on the fracture behaviour of HAZ notched CTOD and wide plate test specimens. Mis-matching of welds, ESIS 17. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications, 1994. p. 445-60.
10. Burget, Memhard D. Weld metal yield strength mis-match effects in fracture toughness test specimens, IIW.Doc.X-F-011-94.
11. Toyoda M, Minami F. Effect of microscopic heterogeneity on fracture initiation behaviour and application to material design, IIW Doc.Sc X-F-071-98.
12. Satoh K., Toyoda M. Fracture toughness evaluation of welds with mechanical heterogeneity. Transactions of the Japan Welding Society. 13:(1):1982;30-37.
13. Murthy K.N., Rao N.K., Krishnan H. Application of instrumented impact testing for studying dynamic fracture behaviour of rotor steels. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 18:(6):1983;1173-1184.
14. Kobayashi T. Analysis of impact properties of A533 steel for nuclear reactor pressure vessel by instrumented Charpy test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 19:(1):1984;49-65.
15. Kobayashi T., Yamamoto I., Niinomi. Introduction of a new dynamic fracture toughness evaluation system. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, JTEVA. 21:(3):1993;145-153.
16. Rajanna K., Bhambri K., Achar D.R.G. An assessment of a CrMoV cast steel weld joint for dynamic fracture behaviour. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 29:(4):1988;387-399.
17. Rice JR, Paris PC, Merkle JG. Progress in flaw growth and fracture toughness testing, ASTM STP 536, 1973. p. 231-45.
18. Server W.L. Journal of Testing and Evaluation JTEVA. 6:(1):1978;29-34.
19. Schwalbe K.H., Hayes B., Baustian K., Cornec A., Gordon R., Homayun M., et al. Validation of the fracture mechanics test method EGF P1-87D (ESIS P!-90/ESIS P1-92). Fatigue Fract. Engng Mater.Structure. 16:(11):1993;1231-1284.