Counterexample to theorems of cox and fine

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 1999, Pages 67-85

  Halpern, Joseph Y ^a  

^a Department of Computer Science and School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SET THEORY;

COX THEOREM; FINE THEOREM;

THEOREM PROVING;

EID: 0033338745     PISSN: 10769757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1613/jair.536     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aczél, J. (1966). Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York.
2. Aczél, J., & Daroczy, Z. (1975). On Measures of Information and Their Characterizations. Academic Press, New York.
3. Aleliunas, R. (1988). A summary of a new normative theory of probabilistic logic. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 8-14. Also in R. Shachter, T. Levitt, L. Kanal, and J. Lemmer, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4, pages 199-206. North-Holland, New York, 1990.
4. Aleliunas, R. (1988). A summary of a new normative theory of probabilistic logic. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 8-14. Also in R. Shachter, T. Levitt, L. Kanal, and J. Lemmer, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4, pages 199-206. North-Holland, New York, 1990.
5. Cheeseman, P. (1988). An inquiry into computer understanding. Computational Intelligence, 4(1), 58-66.
6. Cox, R. (1946). Probability, frequency, and reasonable expectation. American Journal of Physics, 14(1), 1-13.
7. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1990). The logical view of conditioning and its application to possibility and evidence theories. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 4(1), 23-46.
8. Falmagne, J. C. (1981). On a recurrent misuse of a classical functional equation result. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 23(2), 190-193.
9. Fine, T. L. (1973). Theories of Probability. Academic Press, New York.
10. Friedman, N., & Halpern, J. Y. (1995). Plausibility measures: a user's manual. In Proc. Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI '95), pp. 175-184.
11. Friedman, N., & Halpern, J. Y. (1996). Plausibility measures and default reasoning. In Proceedings, Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '96), pp. 1297-1304.
12. Friedman, N., & Halpern, J. Y. (1997). Modeling belief in dynamic systems, part I: foundations. Artificial Intelligence, 95(2), 257-316.
13. Heckerman, D. (1988). An axiomatic framework for belief updates. In Lemmer, J. F., & Kanal, L. N. (Eds.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2, pp. 11-22. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
14. Horvitz, E. J., Heckerman, D., & Langlotz, C. P. (1986). A framework for comparing alternative formalisms for plausible reasoning. In Proceedings, Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '86), pp. 210-214.
15. Jaynes, E. T. (1978). Where do we stand on maximum entropy?. In Levine, R. D., & Tribus, M. (Eds.), The Maximum Entropy Formalism, pp. 15-118. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Jaynes, E. T. (1996). Probability Theory - The Logic of Science. Unpublished; available at http://bayes.wustl.edu.
17. Paris, J. B. (1994). The Uncertain Reasoner's Companion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
18. Reichenbach, H. (1949). The Theory of Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley. This is a translation and revision of the German edition, published as Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre, in 1935.
19. Reichenbach, H. (1949). The Theory of Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley. This is a translation and revision of the German edition, published as Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre, in 1935.
20. Savage, L. J. (1954). Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
21. Tribus, M. (1969). Rational Descriptions, Decisions, and Designs. Pergammon Press, New York.