From technology generation to technology transfer: The concept and reality of the `Dual-Use Technology Centres'

Technovation

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 661-671

  Molas Gallart, Jordi ^a   Sinclair, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

DUAL-USE TECHNOLOGY CENTERS; TECHNOLOGY GENERATION;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0033334593     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00063-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Advisory Council on Science and Technology, 1989. Defence R&D: A National Resource. HMSO, London.
2. Autio E., Laamanen T. Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. International Journal of Technology Management. 10:1995;643-664.
3. Boden, R., Gummett, P., Cox, D., Barker, K., 1998. Men in white coats... men in grey suits: new public management and the funding of scientific research in the UK. Auditing, Accounting of Accountability Journal (in press).
4. Crease, R.P., 1993. The National Labs and Their Future. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, Winter, pp. 96-104.
5. Director Defense Research and Engineering, 1996. Defense Science and Technology Strategy. US Department of Defense, Washington, DC.
6. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, 1987. Civil Research and Development. HMSO, London.
7. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, 1994. Defence Research Agency. HMSO, London.
8. Howells J. Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology-transfer. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 8:1996;91-106.
9. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1996. Institutional Plan. FY 1997-2002. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California.
10. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1996. Strategic Overview. Los Alamos National Laboratory.
11. Molas-Gallart J. Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of "Dual-Use" technology transfer. Research Policy. 26:1997;367-385.
12. Office of Science and Technology, 1993. Realising Our Potential. HMSO, London.
13. Reppy, J., 1994. Technology transfer: a framework for evaluating policy. In: Reppy, J., Pilat, J. (Eds.), Defense Conversion and the Future of the National Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Proceedings of a Conference Held at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1-2 October 1993. Cornell University Peace Studies Program, Occasional Paper No. 18, Ithaca, pp. 49-63.
14. Sandia National Laboratories, 1996. Sandia's Strategic Plan. Sandia National Laboratories.
15. Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, 1995. Task Force on Alternative Futures for the Department of Energy National Laboratories. Alternative Futures for the Department of Energy National Laboratories. Report prepared for the Department of Energy National Laboratories.
16. Secretary of State for Defence, 1998. Defence Diversification: Getting the Most out of Defence Technology. Cm 3861. HMSO, London.
17. Spinardi G. Defence technology enterprises. Science and Public Policy. 19:1992;198-206.
18. Trott P., Cordey-Hayes M. Developing a receptive R&D environment for inward technology-transfer - a case-study of the chemical industry. R&D Management. 26:1996;83-92.
19. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1988. Holding the Edge: Maintaining the Defence Technology Base. OTA-ISC-420. US Government Printing Office. Washington, DC.
20. US Department of Defense, 1995. Dual-Use Technology: A Defense Strategy for Affordable, Leading-Edge Technology. February, Washington, DC.
21. Galtung, J., 1979. Development, environment and technology. Towards a technology for self-reliance. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Report TD/B/CG/23/Rev. 1.