On method statics and dynamics

Information Systems

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 613-637

  Prakash, Naveen ^a  

^a NETAJI SUBHAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DATA STRUCTURES;

META-MODELING; METHOD ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0033333627     PISSN: 03064379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4379(00)00002-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. S. Brinkkemper. Formalisation of Information Systems Modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (1990).
2. S. Brinkkemper, et al. Assembly techniques for method engineering. Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Pisa, Italy, Thanos and Perinici, editors, Springer Verlag (1998).
3. T. Dillon and P.L. Tan. Object-oriented Conceptual Modelling. Prentice Hall, Australia (1993).
4. A. Galloway and B. Stoddart. Integrated formal methods. XV Congress Inforsid, pp. 549-576 (1998).
5. G. Grosz, et al. Modelling and engineering the requirements engineering process: An overview of the NATURE approach. Requirements Engineering Journal, 2(3):115-131 (1997).
6. D. Gupta and N. Prakash. Engineering methods from their requirements. Requirements Engineering Journal (under communication).
7. F. Harmsen, et al. Situational method engineering for informational system project approaches. In Method and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, Verrijn-Stuart and Olle, editors, pp. 169-194, North Holland (1994).
8. V. Plihon. An Environment For Method Engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris (1996).
9. C. Potts. A generic model for representing design methods. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering (1989).
10. N. Prakash. A process view of methodologies. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Wijers, Brinkkemper and Wasserman, editors, pp. 339-352, LNCS 811, Springer Verlag (1994).
11. N. Prakash. Domain based abstraction for method modelling. Ingénierie des Systèmes D'information, AFCET/HERMES, 4(6):745-767 (1996).
12. N. Prakash. and S. Sabharwal. Building CASE tools for methods represented as abstract data types. OOIS'96, Patel, Sun, and Patel, editors, pp. 357-369, Springer (1996).
13. N. Prakash. Towards a formal definition of methods. Requirements Engineering Journal, 2(1):23-50 (1997).
14. N. Prakash, and R. Sibal. Computer assisted quality engineering: A CASE for building quality products. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on the Many Facets of Process Engineering, Gammarth, Tunisia, pp. 25-35 (1997).
15. N. Prakash, and D. Gupta. An architecture for a CAME tool. In Proceedings of the Eighth European - Japanese Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, Finland, pp. 147-166 (1998).
16. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorensen. Object-oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall International (1991).
17. S. Sabharwal and N. Prakash. An algorithmic aasis for CASE tool construction. Information Systems Journal (under communication).
18. K. Smolander. OPRR : A model for modelling systems development methods. In Next Generation of CASE Tools, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1991).
19. C. Souveyet. Validation des Specifications Conceptuelles D'un Systeme D'information. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris (1991).
20. G.M. Wijers. Modelling Support in Information Systems Development. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delft, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam (1991).