Comparing New Designs with Baselines

Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 28-33

  Snow, Michael P ^a   Reising, John M ^a   Barry, Timothy P ^b   Hartsock, David C ^c  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Founder and principal scientist of North Coast Simulation   (United States)

^c now retired ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DESIGN; STATISTICAL METHODS; THEOREM PROVING;

EQUIVALENCY TESTING; NULL HYPOTHESIS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 0033315571     PISSN: 10648046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106480469900700406     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Blackwelder W. C. (1982). “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 3, 345–353.
2. Boldovici J., Kolasinski E. (1997). How to make decisions about the effectiveness of device-based training: Elaborations on what everybody knows. Military Psychology, 9(2), 121–135.
3. Cohen J. (1994). The earth is round (p 5). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
4. Estes W. K. (1997). Significance testing in psychological research: Some persisting issues. Psychological Science, 8(1), 18–20.
5. Fisher R. A. (1960). The design of experiments (7th ed.). New York: Hafner.
6. Frick R. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 379–390.
7. Hauck W., Anderson S. (1992). Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology, 30(5), 181–187.
8. Kim J. S. (1997, May). Determining sample size for equivalence testing. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, 114–115.
9. Lane D. M. (1997). Why the null hypothesis is not accepted (2 of 5).
10. Rogers J. L., Howard K. I., Vessey J. T. (1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 553–565.