Modelling public land-use decisions as a cooperative game

International Journal of Environment and Pollution

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 217-231

  Martin, Wade E ^a   Bender, Holly Wise ^a  

^a Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; GAME THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGIONAL PLANNING;

COMMITTEE GAMES; COOPERATIVE GAMES;

LAND USE;

EID: 0033310548     PISSN: 09574352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijep.1999.002293     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Recreation Coalition (1991) Recreation today, trends, and statistics, Washington, DC.
2. Bormann, B.T., et al., (1994) Volume 5: A framework for sustainable-ecosystem management, USDA forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-33. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, Portland, OR, 61 pages.
3. Farnham, T.J., Taylor, C.P. and Callaway, W. (1995) 'A shift in values: Noncommodity resource management and the Forest Service', Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 281-295.
4. Greenberg, J. (1979) 'Consistent majority rules over compact sets of alternatives', Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 627-736.
5. Laing, J.D., Nakabayashi, S. and Slotznick, B. (1983) 'Winners, blockers and the status quo: simple collective decision games and the core', Public Choice, Vol. 40, pp. 263-279.
6. Laing, J.D. and Slotznick, B. (1987) 'Viable alternative to the status quo: A game-theoretic and laboratory study of four-fifths majority rule', Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 63-85.
7. Maguire, L.A. (1995) Desired Future Conditions for the Chattooga Watershed: A qualitative analysis of diverse public opinions, A report to the Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service.
8. Maguire, L.A. and Boiney, L.G. (1994) 'Resolving environmental disputes: a framework for incorporating decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques', Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 42, pp. 31-48.
9. Martin, W.E., Shields, D.J., Tolwinski, B. and Kent, B. (1997a) 'An application of social choice theory to U.S.D.A. Forest Service decision making', Journal of Policy Modelling, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-19.
10. Martin, W.E., Shields, D.J. and Wise Bender, H. (forthcoming) 'Stakeholder objectives for public lands: rankings of forest management alternatives', J. Environmental Management.
11. McKelvey, R.D., Ordeshook, P.C. and Winer, M. (1978) 'The competitive solution for n-person games without transferable utility, with an application to committee games', American Political Science Review, Vol. 72, pp. 599-615.
12. Ordeshook, P.C. (1986) Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
13. Ordeshook, P.C. and Winer, M. (1980) 'Coalitions and spatial policy outcomes in parliamentary systems: some experimental results', American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 730-51.
14. Power, T.M. (1996) Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: A Search for a Value of Place, Island Press, Washington, DC.
15. Robertson, F.D. (1992) 'Ecosystem management of the national forests and grasslands', Memo to regional foresters and station directors, USDA FS, Washington DC, June 4.
16. Sedjo, R.A. (1995) 'Ecosystem management: An uncharted path for public forests', Resources, Fall.
17. Shields, D. (1993) 'Allocation of costs and benefits from crude oil production on national forests: The effects of accounting stance', Working paper, USDA FS, Rocky Mountain range and Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO 21 pp.
18. Shields, D.J., Towinski, B. and Kent, B.M. (1997) 'Models for conflict resolution in ecosystem management', Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, in press.
19. Wilkinson, C.F. and Anderson, H.M. (1987) Land and Resource Planning in the National Forests, Island Press, Washington, DC.