Oversight mechanisms in public managed care programs: From little oversight to negotiations to shared decision-making

Journal of Health and Human Services Administration

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 139-155

  Beinecke, R H ^a  

^a SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MANAGED CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PEER REVIEW; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW;

EID: 0033306807     PISSN: 10793739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. 'The Massachusetts mental health/substance abuse program: The providers' view'
2. 'Mental health providers' assessment of the Massachusetts mental health/substance abuse program year five: The transition to a new managed care company'
3. 'Development and description of two new instruments for measuring the impact of coordinated social services for children'
4. 'Assessment of the Massachusetts Medicaid managed behavioral health program: Year three'
5. 'Providers' Assessment of the MHMA mental health/substance abuse program outpatient treatment protocols'
6. 'Mental health/substance abuse treatment in managed care: The Massachusetts experience'
7. 'Managed mental health care: Myths and realities in the 1990s'
8. 'Performance measures for mental health programs: Something better, something worse, or more of the same'
9. 'Still muddling, not yet through'
10. 'Management of mental health and substance abuse services: State of the art and early results'
11. 'Preparing for peer and utilization review'
12. 'Outcomes measurement and management with a large medicaid population'
13. 'Markets, bureaucracies, and clans'
14. 'Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy'
15. 'The moral nature of man in organizations: A comparative analysis'
16. 'The dialectical organization: An alternative to bureaucracy'
17. 'Ethical problems in program evaluation: Advice for trapped evaluators'