Neighborhood effects on territorial aggregations of the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa xera archboldi McCrone (Araneae: Lycosidae)

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1006-1012

  Marshall, Samuel D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b HIRAM COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; SPIDER; TERRITORIALITY;

FLORIDA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; CANIS; GEOLYCOSA; GEOLYCOSA XERA; GEOLYCOSA XERA ARCHBOLDI; LYCOSIDAE; XERA;

EID: 0033306735     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/z99-084     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrahamson, W.G., Johnson, A.F., Layne, J.N., and Peroni, P.A. 1984. Vegetation of the Archbold Biological Station: an example of the southern Lake Wales Ridge. Fla. Sci. 47: 209-250.
2. Adams, E. 1998. Territory size and shape in fire ants: a model based on neighborhood interactions. Ecology, 79: 1125-1134.
3. Buss, L.W. 1979. Bryozoan overgrowth interactions - the interdependence of competition for space and food. Nature (Lond.), 281: 475-477.
4. Buss, L.W. 1981. Group living, competition, and the evolution of cooperation in a sessile invertebrate. Science (Washington, D.C.), 213: 1012-1014.
5. Connell, J.H. 1961. The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology, 42: 710-723.
6. Covitch, A.P. 1976. Analyzing shapes of foraging areas: some ecological and economic theories. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 235-257.
7. Gaines, M., and McClenaghan, L., Jr. 1980. Dispersal in small mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 163-196.
8. Goldberg, D.E. 1987. Neighborhood competition in an old-field plant community. Ecology, 68: 1211-1223.
9. Gordon, D. 1992. How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 417-427.
10. Griffiths, D. 1993. Intraspecific competition in ant-lion (Macroleon quinquemaculatus) larvae in the field. Oecologia, 93: 531-537.
11. Johnson, M., and Gaines, M. 1990. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 449-480.
12. Jones, D.W., and Krummel, J.R. 1985. The location theory of animal populations: the case of spatially uniform food distribution. Am. Nat. 126: 392-404.
13. Mack, R.N., and Harper, J.L. 1977. Interference in dune annuals: spatial pattern and neighborhood effects. J. Ecol. 65: 345-363.
14. Marshall, S.D. 1994. Territorial aggregations of Geolycosa xera archboldi McCrone: formation, maintenance, and consequences. P.h.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
15. Marshall, S.D. 1995a. Natural history, activity patterns, and relocation rates of a burrowing wolf spider: Geolycosa xera archboldi McCrone (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 23: 65-70.
16. Marshall, S.D. 1995b. Mechanisms of the formation of territorial aggregations of the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa xera archboldi McCrone (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 23: 145-150.
17. Marshall, S.D. 1996. Evidence for territorial behavior in a burrowing wolf spider. Ethology, 102: 32-39.
18. Marshall, S.D. 1997. The ecological determinants of space use by a burrowing wolf spider in a xeric shrubland ecosystem. J. Arid Environ. 37: 379-393.
19. Marshall, S.D., and Gittleman, J.L. 1994. Clutch size in spiders: Is more better? Funct. Ecol. 8: 118-124.
20. Morse, D. 1988. Relationship between crab spider Misumena vatia nesting success and earlier patch-choice decisions. Ecology, 69: 1970-1973.
21. Moya-Laraño, J., Orta-Ocaño, J.M., Barrientos, J.A., and Cases, A. 1996. Dynamics of a population of burrowing wolf spiders. Is there any competition? Rev. Suisse Zool. Vol. hors série. 491-499.
22. Pacala, S.W. 1988. Competitive equivalence: the coevolutionary consequences of the sedentary habit. Am. Nat. 132: 576-593.
23. Pacala, S.W., and Silander, J.A., Jr. 1990. Field tests of neighborhood population dynamic models of two annual weed species. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 113-134.
24. Pacala, S.W., and Weiner, J. 1991. Effects of competitive asymmetry on the local density model of plant interference. J. Theor. Biol. 149: 165-179.
25. Rayor, L.S., and Uetz, G.W. 1990. Trade-offs in foraging success and predation risk with spatial position in colonial spiders. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 77-85.
26. Riechert, S.E. 1976. Web-site selection in the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta. Oikos, 27: 311-315.
27. Riechert, S.E. 1978. Energy based territoriality in populations of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch). Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. No. 42. pp. 211-222.
28. Riechert, S. 1981. The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am. Nat. 117: 871-892.
29. Sage, R. 1982. Wet and dry-weight estimates of insects and spiders based on length. Am. Midl. Nat. 108: 407-411.
30. Southwood, T. 1962. Migration in terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 37: 171-214.
31. Stamps, J.A. 1984. Rank-dependant compromises between growth and predator protection in lizard dominance hierarchies. Anim. Behav. 32: 1101-1107.
32. Stamps, J.A. 1994. Territorial behavior: testing the assumptions. Adv. Study Behav. 23: 173-232.
33. Uetz, G.W. 1992. Foraging strategies of spiders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 155-159.
34. Wise, D.H. 1993. Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.