Is centralized histopathology review necessary for screen-detected breast lesions?

Breast

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 320-327

  Newman, P ^a   Bilous, M ^b   Boyages, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BREAST CANCER; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST LESION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033301276     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/brst.1999.0084     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Do pathologists play dice?
2. When and to what end do pathologists agree?
3. Quality control of patho-anatomical diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast
4. Reproducibility of histological diagnoses and diagnostic accuracy of non-palpable breast lesions
5. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma
6. Histological grading of breast cancer: A study of reproducibility of consensus grading
7. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: A study of interobserver agreement
8. Reproducibility of histological diagnosis of breast lesions
9. A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Correlation with grade of associated invasive component
10. Lobular carcinoma in situ
11. Developing a prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
12. Ductal carcinoma in situ part 1: Definition and diagnosis
13. Adequacy of histopathology reports for breast cancer in NSW
14. Benign breast diseases, carcinoma in situ, and breast cancer risk
15. The woman at high risk for breast cancer
16. Premalignant conditions and markers of elevated risk in the breast and their management
17. Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: Findings of the UK National External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme
18. A coefficent of agreement for nominal scales
19. High agreement but low kappa: 1. The problems of two paradoxes
20. Bias, prevalence and kappa
21. Borderline epithelial lesions of the breast
22. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria
23. Using autopsy series to estimate the disease ″reservoir″ for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: How much more breast cancer can we find?
24. Ductal carcinoma of the breast: Reproducibility of histological subtype analysis
25. The role of pathology in premalignancy and as a guide for treatment and prognosis in breast cancer
26. Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ: Striving for clinical relevance in the era of breast conserving therapy
27. Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology
28. Mammary intraepithelial neoplasia - A translational classification system for the intraductal epithelial proliferations