Intrusion detection systems as evidence

Computer Networks

Volumn 31, Issue 23, 1999, Pages 2477-2487

  Sommer, Peter ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; COMPUTER PRIVACY; DATA PRIVACY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SECURITY OF DATA; SIGNAL DETECTION;

INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS (IDS);

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 0033295914     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1286(99)00113-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NTSAC) Network Group Intrusion Detection Subgroup, available on http://www.ntsac.org as FIDSGREP.PDF.
2. P. Sommer, Digital footprints: assessing computer evidence, Criminal Law Review Special Edition: Crime, Criminal Justice and the Internet, 1998, pp. 61-78.
3. ss 23-24 Criminal Justice Act, 1988, s 8 Civil Evidence Act 1995.
4. s 78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984.
5. Harvey, The advocate's devil, 1985.
6. Court of Appeal, July 31, 1996.
7. Frye v US 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
8. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2786, 1993.
9. L.P. Brad, Beyond the rule in Mohan: a new model for assessing the reliability of scientific evidence, Toronto Law Review 54 (1).
10. P. Sommer, Evidence from cyberspace: downloads, logs and captures, Journal of Financial Crime 5JFC2, 138-152.
11. B. Schneier, J. Kelsey, Cryptographic support for secure logs on untrusted machines, The Seventh USENIX Security Symposium Proceedings, USENIX Press, January 1998, pp. 53-62.