Personality and sex role orientation among 17-19 year old females in England

Irish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 2-4, 1999, Pages 172-178

  Francis, Leslie J ^a,b   Wilcox, Carolyn ^c  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^c N England Inst for Chrstn Educ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033294283     PISSN: 03033910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03033910.1999.10558233     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arnold, J. & Bye, H. (1989). Sex and sex role self-concept as correlates of career decision-making self-efficacy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 17, 201-206.
2. Arrindell, W.A., Vergara, A.I., Torres, B., Caballo, V.E., Sanderman, R., Calvo, M.G., Ende, J. van der, Oosterhof, L., Castro, J., Palenzuela, D.L, Zaldivar, F. & Simon, M.A. (1997). Gender roles in relation to assertiveness and Eysenckian personality dimensions: Replication with a Spanish population sample. Sex Roles, 36, 79-92.
3. Bem, S.L. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
4. Chung, Y.B. (1995). The construct validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory for heterosexual and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 30, 87-97.
5. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
6. Eysenck, H.J. & Eysenck S.B.G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
7. Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J. & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
8. Francis, L.J. (1992). Is psychoticism really a dimension of personality fundamental to religiosity? Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 645-652.
9. Francis, L.J., Philipchalk, R. & Brown, L.B. (1991). The comparability of the short form EPQ-R with the EPQ among students in England, the USA, Canada and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1129-1132.
10. Francis, L.J. & Wilcox, C. (1998). The relationship between Eysenck's personality dimensions and Bem's masculinity and femininity scales revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 683-687.
11. Kimlicka, T.A., Sheppard, J.M., Sheppard, P.L. & Wakefield, J.A. (1988). The relationship between Eysenck's personality dimensions and Bem's masculinity and femininity scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 833-835.
12. Knutson, G.G. (1990). Androgynous and feminine sex-role identity in elementary and secondary teachers. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 29, 32-39.
13. Nagoshi, C.T., Pitts, S.C. & Nakata, T. (1993). Intercorrelations of attitudes, personality and sex role orientation in a college sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 603-604.
14. SPSS Inc. (1988). SPSSX User's Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill
15. Williams, D.G. (1982). Relationships between the Bem Sex Role Inventory and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 223-224.