|
Volumn 7, Issue 2-4, 1999, Pages 265-276
|
Competence and consent to research: A critique of the recommendations of the national bioethics advisory commission
|
Author keywords
Competence; Decisionmaking capacity; Human subjects; Informed consent; Research
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ETHICS;
EVALUATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION;
PATIENT SELECTION;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
RISK;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICS;
ETHICS COMMITTEES;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
GUIDELINES;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
RISK;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0033291735
PISSN: 08989621
EISSN: 15455815
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/08989629908573957 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (8)
|