The Confucian relational concept of the person and its modern predicament

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 325-346

  Ci, Jiwei ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; FAMILY RELATION; FREEDOM; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INDIVIDUALITY; MORALITY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSONHOOD; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICS; RELIGION; RELIGIOUS APPROACH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL WELFARE;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; RELIGIOUS APPROACH;

BIOETHICS; CONFUCIANISM; FAMILY RELATIONS; FREEDOM; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSONHOOD; POLITICS; RELIGION; RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHIES; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL VALUES; SOCIAL WELFARE;

EID: 0033290927     PISSN: 10546863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/ken.1999.0022     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ames, Roger T. 1988. Rites as Rights: The Confucian Alternative. In Human Rights and the World's Religions, ed. Leroy S. Rouner, pp. 199-216. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
2. Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Dong, Zhongshu. 1989. Chunqiu fanlu. Shanghai: Shanghai guji Chubanshe.
4. Feng, Erkang, et. al. 1994. Zhongguo zongzu shehui. Hangzhou: Jejiang renmin chubanshe.
5. Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. _. 1995. Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy 92: 109-31.
7. Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8. Hansen, Chad. 1985. Individualism in Chinese Thought. In Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, ed. Donald Munro, pp. 35-56. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.
9. Hui, Edwin C. 1998 (in press). Jen and Perichoresis: The Confucian and Christian Bases of the Relational Person. In The Moral Status of Persons: Perspectives on Bioethics, ed. Gerhold K. Becker. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.
10. Jiang, Qing. 1989. Zhongguo dalu fuxing ruxue de xianshi yiyi jiqi mianlin de wenti (1). Ehu yuekan 15: 29-38.
11. King, Ambrose Y. C. 1985. The Individual and Group in Confucianism: A Relational Perspective. In Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, ed. Donald Munro, pp. 57-70. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.
12. Lee, Kwang-Sae. 1994. Some Confucian Reflections on the Concept of Autonomous Individual. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 21: 49-59.
13. Lee, Seung-Hwan. 1992. Was There a Concept of Rights in Confucian Virtue-Based Morality? Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19: 241-61.
14. Liao, Shenbai. and Sun, Chunchen, eds. 1997. Lunli xinshidian: zhuanxing shiqi de shehui lunli yu daode. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
15. Marx, Karl. 1964. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, trans. Martin Milligan. New York: International Publishers.
16. Rosemont, Henry, Jr.. 1991. Rights-Bearing Individuals and Role-Bearing Persons. In Rules, Rituals, and Responsibility: Essays Dedicated to Herbert Fingarette, ed. Mary I. Bockover, pp. 71-101. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
17. Ruan, Jizheng. 1996. Rujia wenhua chuantong yu dangdai daode jiangou. Zhexue yanjiu 4: 38-45.
18. Tao, Julia. 1990. The Chinese Moral Ethos and the Concept of Individual Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 7: 119-27.
19. _. 1998. Confucianism. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol.1, ed. Ruth Chadwick, pp. 597-608. San Diego: Academic Press.
20. Yang, Shi. 1991. Zhongxi renlun de chongtu. Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe.
21. Zhang, Dainian. 1989. Zhongguo lunlisixiangyianjiu. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe.