Protective effects of resin impregnation on demineralization of enamel

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue , 1999, Pages 315-320

  Glasspoole, Eileen A ^a   Erickson, Robert L ^a   Davidson, Carel L ^b  

^a 3M COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORIDE; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ENAMEL PERMEABILITY; FLUORIDES; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

EID: 0033290188     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Glatz EGM, Featherstone JDB. Demineralization related to orthodontic bands and brackets. A clinical study. Am J Orthod 1985;87:87 (Abstr).
2. Øgaard B, Rølla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94:68-73.
3. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JDB. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92:33-40.
4. Øgaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: A study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 96:423-427.
5. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81:93-98.
6. Zachrisson BU, Heimgärd E, Ruyter IE, et al. Problems with sealants for bracket bonding. Am J Orthod 1979; 75:641-649.
7. Ceen RF, Gwinnett AJ. Microscopic evaluation of the thickness of sealants used in orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod 1980; 78:623-629.
8. Joseph VP, Roussouw PE, Basson NJ. Do sealants seal? An SEM investigation. J Clin Orthod 1992; 26:141-144.
9. Hughes DO, Hembree JH, Weber FN. Preparations to prevent decalcification during orthodontic treatment compared. An in vitro study. Am J Orthod 1979; 75:416-420.
10. Donly KJ, Ruíz M. In vitro demineralization inhibition of enamel caries utilizing an unfilled resin. Clin Prev Dent 1992; 14:22-24.
11. Frazier MC, Southard TE, Doster PM. Prevention of enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment: An in vitro study using pit and fissure sealants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:459-465.
12. Davidson CL, Bekke-Hoekstra IS. The resistance of superficially sealed enamel to wear and carious attack in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1980;7:299-305.
13. Silverstone LM. Fissure sealants: The susceptibility to dissolution of acid-etched and subsequently abraded enamel in vitro. Caries Res 1977;11:46-51.
14. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. An overview. Br J Orthod 1992; 19:199-205.
15. Lagerweij MD, deVosselin deJong E, tenCate JM. The videocamera compared with the densitometer as a scanning device for microradiography. Caries Res 1994; 28:353-362.
16. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974;163.
17. Margolis HC, Moreno EC, Murphy BJ. Effect of low levels of fluoride in solution on enamel demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 1986;65:23-29.
18. ten Cate JM, Buijs MJ, Damen JJM. pH-cycling of enamel and dentin lesions in the presence of low concentrations of fluoride. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103:362-367.
19. Sonis AL, Snell W. An evaluation of a fluoride-releasing, visible light-activated bonding system for orthodontic bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95:306-311.
20. Fitzpatrick DA, Way DC. The effects of wear, acid etching, and bond removal on human enamel. Am J Orthod 1977; 72:671-681.