Formula for success according to TIMSS or the subliminal decay of jurisdictional educultural integrity?

Alberta Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 225-238

  Puk, Tom ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033269191     PISSN: 00024805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Alberta Ministry of Education. (1990). Science a.1 (junior high) (rev. ed.). Edmonton, AB: Author.
2. Atkin, J.M., & Black, P. (1997). Policy perils of international comparisons: The TIMSS case. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 22-28.
3. Baker, D.P. (1997). Surviving TIMSS: Or, everything you blissfully forgot about international comparisons. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 295-300.
4. Bailey, P. (1998, May). Envisioning scientific literacy in Canada: An analysis of the Pan-Canadian protocol. Paper presented to the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Canadian Association of Curriculum Studies, Congress of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Ottawa.
5. Beaton, A.E., Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Gonzalez, E.J., Smith, T.A., & Kelly, D.L. (1996). Third international mathematics and science study: Science achievement in the middle years. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
6. Berliner, D.C. (1993). Educational reform in an era of disinformation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 1(2), 1-32.
7. Biddle, B. (1997). Foolishness, dangerous nonsense, and real correlates of state differences in achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 9-13.
8. Bracey, G.W. (1998a). TIMSS, rhymes with "dims," as in "witted." Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 686-687.
9. Bracey, G.W. (1998b). Tinkering with TIMSS. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 32-35.
10. Council of Ministers of Education. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum. Ottawa, ON: Author.
11. Education Quality and Accountability Office. (1998). Selected research highlights TIMSS population 2 (13-year-olds). Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario.
12. Hawkes, M., Kimmelman, P., & Kroeze, D. (1997). Becoming "first in the world" in math and science: Moving high expectations and promising practices to scale. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 30-33.
13. Hunter, J.H., & Benson, G.D. (1997). Arrows in time: The misapplication of chaos theory to education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(10), 87-100.
14. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1994). Teacher questionnaire (science) population 2. The Hague, Author.
15. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1997). Performance assessment in IEA's third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
16. LeTendre, G.K. (1999). The problem of Japan: Qualitative studies and international educational comparisons. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 38-45.
17. Martin, M.O., & Kelly, D.L (Eds.). (1996). Third international mathematics and science study: Technical report, volume 1. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
18. Miller, J.P., & Seller, W. (1990). Curriculum perspectives and practice. Toronto, ON: Copp Clark Pitman.
19. Nagy, P. (1996). International comparisons of student achievement in mathematics and science: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Education 27, 396-413.
20. Ontario Ministry of Education. (1980). Issues and directions. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.
21. Ontario Ministry of Education. (1985). The provincial review report of education in the junior division. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.
22. Ontario Ministry of Education. (1988). Canadian studies geography: A report for educators. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.
23. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (November 1996). Moving Ontario students to the head of the class [Internet News Release]. Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/nr/nr.html.
24. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (June 1997). New demanding curriculum to put students at the head of the class [Internet News Release]. Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/nr/nr.html.
25. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (March 1998a). Speaking notes for education and training minister. [Internet News Release], Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/nr/nr.html.
26. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (1998b). Science and technology: The Ontario curriculum, grades 1-8. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer
27. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (1999). Ontario secondary schools, grades 9 to 12: Program and diploma requirements. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer.
28. Philp, M. (1999, April). Ontario to make teachers requalify. On-line. Toronto, ON: The Globe and Mail. http://www.globeandmail.com/gam/Natioral/19990420/UTORYM.htm
29. Puk, T.G. (1994). Espoused and de facto levels of aspiration: Implications of an analysis of Ontario ministry of education curriculum policy guidelines. Brock Education, 4(3), 11-19.
30. Puk, T.G. (1996a). The integration of extrarational and rational meta-learning processes: Moving towards the whole learner. Journal of Educational Thought 30, 119-137.
31. Puk, T.G. (1996b). Instructing preservice student-teachers how to use a process of inquiry to teach elementary social studies. Journal of Social Studies Research, 20(2), 39-44.
32. Puk, T.G. (1997). TIMSS science research study: Detailed analysis of teaching practices in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Singapore and England. Unpublished raw data.
33. Puk, T.G. (1998, May). Teaching practices of high scoring jurisdictions in TIMSS as compared to those in Ontario: What does it all mean? Paper presented to the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Canadian Association of Curriculum Studies, Congress of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Ottawa.
34. Puk, T.G., & Haines, J. (1998). Curriculum implementation in Ontario: Espoused and de facto aspirations for inquiry. McGill Journal of Education, 33, 189-206.
35. Puk, T.G., & Haines, J. (in press). Are schools prepared to allow beginning teachers to reconceptualize instruction? Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education.
36. Robitaille, D.F., Taylor, A.R., & Orpwood, G. (1996). The third international mathematics and science study - Canada report, Volume 1. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
37. Robinson, F.G. (1973). Problem-solving: Creating a trend toward a shared image. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto.
38. Ross, J., & Maynes, F. (1985). Retention of problem-solving performance in school contexts. Canadian Journal of Education, 10, 383-401.
39. Science Teachers' Association of Ontario. (1997). President's message. Crucible, 28(4), 5-6.
40. Smith, D.G. (1999a) Globalization and education: Prospects for postcolonial pedagogy in a hermeneutic mode - Introduction. Interchange, 30(1), 1-10.
41. Smith, D.G. (1999b). Economic fundamentalism, globalization, and the public remains of education. Interchange, 30(1), 93-117.
42. TIMSS International Study Center. (1996a). Third international mathematics and science study: P-Value almanac for science teachers background items population 2. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
43. TIMSS International Study Center. (1996b). Third international mathematics and science study: Report of students by science teacher background variables, population 2. Unpublished raw data.
44. Wang, J. (1998). A content examination of the TIMSS items. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 36-38.
45. Winchester, I. (1999). Preface. Interchange, 30(1), i-ii.