Expanding access: Changes in vocational rehabilitation practice since the 1992 rehabilitation act amendments

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 30-40

  Whitney Thomas, Jean ^a   Timmons, Jaimie Ciulla ^a   Gilmore, Dana Scott ^a   Thomas, Dawna M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033264137     PISSN: 00343552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003435529904300106     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
2. Bertrand, J. T., Brown J. E., & Ward, V. M. (1992). Techniques for analyzing focus group data. Evaluation Review, 16, 198-209.
3. Campbell, J. (1991). The consumer movement and implications for vocational rehabilitation practice. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 1(3), 67-75.
4. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Feist-Price, S. (1995). African Americans with disabilities and equity in vocational rehabilitation services: One state's review. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 119-129.
6. Fink, A., & Kosekoff, J. B. (1985). How to conduct surveys: A step by step guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Goodall, P., Lawyer, H., & Wehman, P. (1994). Vocational rehabilitation and traumatic brain injury: A legislative and public policy perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9(2), 61-81.
8. Griffin, C. (1994). Improving rehabilitation service utilization among ethnic/racial groups: Rehabilitation administrator's role. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 18(1), 37-43.
9. Guy, B., Merrill, P., & Johnson, D. R. (1993). IDEA and Rehabilitation Act Amendments: Impact on employment. IMPACT, 6(3), 14-19.
10. Hildebrand, D. K., Laing, J. D., & Rosenthal, H. (1977). Analysis of ordinal data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Leuchovius, D., & Parker, R. (1994, September). The Rehabilitation Act and the ADA connection. The Pacesetter, 18-19.
13. Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3-19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Pati, G. C., & Bailey, E. K. (1995). Empowering people with disabilities: Strategy and human resource issues in implementing the ADA. Organizational Dynamics, 23(3), 52-69.
15. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. RehabACTion Advocacy Network. (1992, October). Congress extends Rehabilitation Act for five years: Major emphasis set on placement in competitive employment. In the Public Interest, 1(6), 1-13.
17. Rehabilitation Act Amendment of 1992, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 722, 1599 (West 1993).
18. Rehabilitation Services Administration. (1990). RSA-911 caseload statistics FY 88. Washington, DC: Author.
19. Rehabilitation Services Administration. (1995). RSA-911 caseload statistics FY 93. Washington, DC: Author.
20. Rehabilitation Services Administration. (1997). RSA-911 caseload statistics FY 97. Washington, DC: Author.
21. Schalock, R. L. (1994). Quality of life, quality enhancement, and quality assurance: Implications for program planning and evaluation in the field of mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 121-131.
22. Schriner, K. F. (1996). The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992: Initiatives and issues. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 27(1), 37-41.
23. Shreve, M. (1994). The greater vision: An advocate's reflections on the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992. American Rehabilitation, 60(2), 8-13.
24. SPSS Inc. (1995). SPSS 6.1.1 [Computer Software]. (1995). Chicago, IL: Author.
25. Temelini, D., & Fesko, S. L. (1996, June). Shared responsibility: Job search practices from the consumer and staff perspective. Research to Practice, 2(1). (Available from Institute for Community Inclusion, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115)
26. Thomas, D., & Whitney-Thomas, J. (1996). Perspectives from consumers on elements that influence vocational rehabilitation service delivery. Research to Practice, 2(5). (Available from Institute for Community Inclusion, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115)
27. Weber, M. C. (1994). Towards access, accountability, procedural regularity and participation: The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992 and 1993. Journal of Rehabilitation, 60(3), 21-25.
28. West, M. (1995). Choice, self-determination and vocational rehabilitation services: Systemic barriers for consumers with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 281-290.
29. Whitney-Thomas, J., & Thomas, D. M. (1996). Multiple perspectives on implementing the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992. Research to Practice, 2(6). (Available from Institute for Community Inclusion, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115)