The effects of the cognitive interview and other methods of context reinstatement on identification

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 5, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 61-80

  Clifford, B R ^a   Gwyer, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033259185     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683169908414994     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 708-729.
2. Bekerian, D. A. and Dennett, J. L. (1993). The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 275-297.
3. Bjork, R. A. and Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.). Current Issues in Cognitive Processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313-344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cutler, B. L. and Penrod, S. D. (1988). Context reinstatement and eyewitness identification. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.). Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 231-244). Chichester: Wiley.
5. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D. and Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.
6. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., O'Rourke, T. E. and Martens, T. K. (1986). Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behaviour, 1, 113-134.
7. Davies, G. M. (1988). Faces and places: Laboratory research on context and face recognition. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.). Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 35-53). Chichester: Wiley.
8. Davies, G. M. and Thomson, D. M. (Eds.). (1988). Memory in Context: Context in Memory. Chichester: Wiley.
9. Fisher, R. P. (1995). Personal communication.
10. Fisher, R. P., McCauley, M. and Geiselman, R. E. (1994). Improving eyewitness testimony with the cognitive interview. In D. Ross, J. Read and M. Toglia (Eds.). Adult Eyewitness Memory: Current Trends and Developments, (pp. 245-269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fisher, R. P., Quigley, K. L., Brock, P., Chin, D. and Cutler, B. L. (1990). The effectiveness of the cognitive interview in description and identification tasks. Cited in D. Ross, J. Read and M. Toglia (Eds.). Adult Eyewitness Memory: Current Trends and Developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gwyer, P. and Clifford, B. R. (1997). The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification, confidence and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 121-145.
13. Krafka, C. and Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58-69.
14. Loftus, E. F., Manber, M. and Keating, J. P. (1983). Recollections of naturalistic events: Context enhancement versus negative cueing. Human Learning, 2, 83-92.
15. Malpass, R. S. and Devine, P. G. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 343-350.
16. McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, D. C., Einstein, G. O. and O'Halloran, C. M. (1989). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 523-548.
17. McSpadden, M. D., Schooler, J. W. and Loftus, E. F. (1988). Here today, gone tomorrow: The appearance and disappearance of context effects. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.). Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 215-229). Chichester: Wiley.
18. Memon, A. (1982). Context Effects in Face Recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nottingham University, United Kingdom.
19. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R. and Koehnken, G. (1997). Context reinstatement in the laboratory: How useful is it? In D. G. Payne and F. G. Conrad (Eds.). Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research (pp. 175-191). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Shapiro, P. N. and Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
21. Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.). Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 13-33). Chichester: Wiley.
22. Smith, S. M. (1994). Theoretical principles of context dependent memory. In P. F. Morris and M. Gruneberg (Eds.). Theoretical Aspects of Memory (pp. 168-195). London: Routledge.
23. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. and Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory and Cognition, 6, 342-353.
24. Smith, S. M. and Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 125-139.
25. Thomson, D. M. (1988). Context and false recognition. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.). Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 285-304). Chichester: Wiley.
26. Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 353-370.
27. Wilhite, S. C. (1991). Evidence of a negative environmental reinstatement effect. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 325-342.