Value of the relative phonetogram (RP) for voice assessment;Valeur du phonetogramme relatif (PR) dans l'evaluation des dysphonies organiques

Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 231-238

  Hilgenheger, C ^a,b   Sarfati, J ^c   Reyt, E ^c   Sittel, C ^a   Eckel, H E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic voice analysis; Mpt; Organic dysphonia; Perceptual voice evaluation; Relative phonetogram; Voice field

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX DISORDER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHONATION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VOICE; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOUND DETECTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0033256139     PISSN: 00351334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. SCHUTTE HK, AND SEIDNER W. Recommandation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. FOLIA PHONIATR (BASEL). 1983,35,6: 286-8.
2. COLEMAN RF. Sources of variation in phonetograms. J VOICE. 1993;7,1:1-14.
3. GRAMMING P, SUNDBERG J, et al. Variability of phonetograms. FOLIA PHONIATR (BASEL). 1991;43,2:79-92.
4. HEYLEN LG, WUYTS FL, et al. Phonetography in voice diagnoses. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOL BELG. 1996;50,4:299-308.
5. KLINGHOLZ FM. Die quantitative Auswertung der Stimmfeldmessung. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör 7. Georg-Thieme-Verlag Stuttgart. 1983;7:106-110.
6. NEUSCHAEFER-RUBE C, SRAM F, et al. Three-dimensional phonetographic assessment of voice performance in professional and non-professional speakers. FOLIA PHONIATR LOGOP. 1997;49,2:96-104.
7. SCHULTZ-COULON HJ, ASCHE S Das "Normstimmfeld" - ein Vorschlag, Sprache - Stimme - Gehör. 1988;12:5-8.
8. SULTER AM, SCHUTTE HK, et al. Differences in phonetogram features between male and female subjects with and without vocal training. J VOICE. 1995;9,4:363-77.
9. FRESNEL-ELBAZ E. Exploration de la phonation. In: Explorations fonctionnelles en ORL. Courtat PP. Frenel-Elbaz C. ED Paris, Masson. 1994:146-174.
10. HACKI T, FRITTANG B Verfahren zur statistischen Ermittlung von Stimmfeldgrenzen - Das Durchschnittsstimmfeld. Sprache-Stimme-Gehor. 1990; 14:110-112.
11. SITTEL C, ECKEL HE, ESCHENBURG C. Phonatory results after laser surgery for glottic carcinoma. OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG. 1998;119,4:418-24.
12. BAKEN R. Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice. I. Chapter 5. Singular Publishing Group. San Diego/London 1996.
13. MICHAELIS DF, STRUBE MHW. Selection and combination of acoustic features for the discription of pathologic voices. J ACOUST SOC AM. 1998;103,3:1628-1639.
14. DEJONCKERE PH, REMACLE M, et al. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and corrélations with acoustic measurements. REV LARYNGOL OTOL RHINOL. 1996;117,3:219-24.
15. DEJONCKERE PH, OBBENS C, et al Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. FOLIA PHONIATR (BASEL). 1993;45.2.76-83.
16. ZWIRNER PMD, KRUSE E. Akustische Stimmanalysen zur Dokumentation der Stimmrehabilitation nach laserchirurgischer Larynxkarzinomresektion. HNO, 1996;44:514-520.
17. GIOVANNI A, ROBERT D, TESTON B, GUARELLA MD, ZANARET M. Etude préliminaire des paramètres acoustiques et aérodynamiques après, laryngectomie frontale antérieure de Tucker. ANN. OTOLARYNGOL. CHIR. CERVICOFAC 1996;113:277-284.
18. MICHAELIS DFM, STRUBE HW Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices. J ACOUST SOC AM. 1998;103,3:1628-1639.