Study of the Effect of Using Mini-Transitional Implants as Temporary Abutments in Implant Overdenture Cases

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 152-158

  El Attar, Mohamed Sherine ^a,b   El Shazly, Dina ^a   Osman, Saiida ^a   El Domiati, Shahira ^a   Salloum, Mahmoud Gamal ^a  

^a ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b Alex Univ ^*  (Egypt)

Author keywords

Immediate support; Interim support; Mini transitional implants; Temporary implants

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WOUND HEALING;

CUSPID; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; DENTURE, PARTIAL, TEMPORARY; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0033253530     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199908020-00007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Vassos DM. Immediate loading of implants: An improved treatment for the elderly. Dent Implantol Update. 1996;7: 81-82.
2. Branemark PI. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson I, eds. Tissue Integrated Prosthesis: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1985:11-76.
3. Misch CE. Progressive bone loading. Pract Periodont Esthet Dent. 1990;2: 27-30.
4. Sendax VI. Mini-implant strategy offers a broad range of uses. Dent Today. 1995;14.
5. Uhthoff HK. Mechanical factors influencing the holding power of screws in compact bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973;55:633-639.
6. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:225-261.
7. Schatzker J, Horne JG, Summer Smith G. The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone. Clin Orthop. 1975;111:257-262.
8. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Banemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:142-146.
9. Misch CE. Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;6:23-31.
10. Albrektsson T. Bone tissue response. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prosthesis: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1985:129-143.
11. Lambert P, Morris HF, Ochi S, et al. Relationship between implant surgical experience and second stage failures: DICRG interim report no. 2. Implant Dent. 1994;3:97-99.
12. Gottehrer NR, Singer G. Preliminary stabilization of full denture implant patients. Dent Today. 1996;15:56-60.
13. El Sharkawy W. Augmentation of resorbed mandibular ridge with resorbable tricalcuim phosphate and non-resorbable hydroxylapatite. PhD Thesis 1998. Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
14. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1993;460-461.
15. Gottehrer NR, Singer G. Full team approach for provisional stabilization of the edentulous implant patients. Dent Today. 1996:15:56-59.
16. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1993:21.
17. Roberts WE, GarettoLP, DeCastro RA. Remodeling of devitalized bone threatens periosteal margin integrity of endosseous titanium implants with threaded or smooth surfaces: Indications for provisional loading and axially directed occlusion. Indiana Dent Assoc. 1989;68: 9-24.
18. Hart RT, Davy DT. Theories of bone modeling & remodeling. In Cowin SC, ed. Bone Mechanics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989:253.
19. Roberts WE et al. Bone physiology and metabolism. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1987;15:54-61.
20. Dahlin N, Olsson KE. Bone content and physical activity. Acta Orthop Scand. 1974; 45:170-175.