Current value of double-contrast pharyngography and of computed tomography for the detection and for staging of hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and supraglottic tumors

European Radiology

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1843-1850

  Keberle, M ^a   Kenn, W ^a   Tschammler, A ^a   Wittenberg, G ^a   Hilgarth, M ^a   Hoppe, F ^a   Hahn, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CT; Deglutition disorders; Larynx; Neoplasms; Pharynx; Radiography

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMAN; HYPOPHARYNX TUMOR; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX TUMOR; LYMPHOMA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; OROPHARYNX TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PHARYNX; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BARIUM SULFATE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; HYPOPHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGOSCOPY; LYMPHOMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; OROPHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; PHARYNX; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0033253494     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050933     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ekberg O, Pokieser P (1997) Radiologic evaluation of the dysphagic patient. Eur J Radiol 8: 1285
2. Deitmer T (1991) Klinische Aspekte zu bildgebenden Verfahren am Larynx. Radiologe 31: 313-318
3. Jones B, Donner MW (1988) Examination of the patient with dysphagia. Radiology 167: 319-326
4. Rubesin SE, Jones B, Donner MW (1987) Contrast pharyngography: the importance of phonation. AJR 148: 269-272
5. Silverman PM, Bossen EH, Fisher SR, Cole TB, Korobkin M, Halvorsen RA (1984) Carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx: CT-histopathologic correlations. Radiology 151: 697-702
6. Zaunbauer W, Haertel M (1982) Zur CT-diagnostik maligner Larynxtumoren. Fortschr Roentgenstr 136: 694-699
7. Gamsu G, Webb WR, Shallit JB, Moss AA (1981) CT in carcinoma of the larynx and pyriform sinus: value of phonation scans. AJR 136: 577-584
8. Mukherji SK, Pillsbury HR, Castillo M. (1997) Imaging squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: what clinicians need to know. Radiology 205: 629-646
9. Thabet HM, Sessions DG, Gado MH, Gnepp DA, Harvey JE, Talaat M (1996) Comparison of clinical evaluation and CT diagnostic accuracy for tumors of the larynx and hypopharynx. Laryngoscope 106: 589-594
10. Mancuso A, Hanafee W (1979) A comparative evaluation of CT and laryngography. Radiology 133: 131-138
11. Lenz M, Ozdoba C, Bongers H, Skalej M (1987) CT-Funktionsaufnahmen des Larynx und Hypopharynx. Fortschr Roentgenstr 150: 509-515
12. Curtin HD (1989) Imaging of the larynx: current concepts. Radiology 173: 1-11
13. Saleh EM, Mancuso AA, Stringer SP (1993) Relative roles of CT and endoscopy for determining the inferior extent of pyriform sinus carcinoma: correlative histopathologic study. Head and Neck 15: 44-52
14. Becker M, Zbaeren P, Delavelle J et al. (1997) Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: reassessment of criteria for diagnosis at CT. Radiology 203: 521-532
15. Van den Brekel MWM, Runne RW, Smeele LE, Tiwari RM, Snow GB, Castelijns JA (1998) Assessment of tumour invasion into the mandible: the value of different imaging techniques. Eur J Radiol 8: 1552-1557
16. Hermans R, Van der Goten A, Baert AL (1997) Image interpretation in CT of laryngeal carcinoma: a study on intra-and interobserver reproducibility. Eur J Radiol 7: 1086-1090
17. Held P, Rupp N (1991) Tumoren des Oropharynx, Hypopharynx und Larynx - Diagnose durch MR. Bildgebung 58: 132-140
18. Held P, Breit A (1994) MRI and CT of tumors of the pharynx: comparison of the two imaging procedures including fast and ultrafast MR sequences. Eur J Radiol 18: 81-91