A comparison of three superimposition methods

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 717-725

  You, Q L ^a   Hagg U ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033250745     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.6.717     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baughan B, Demirjian A, Levesque G Y, Lapalme-Chaput L 1979 The pattern of facial growth before and during puberty as shown by French-Canadian girls. Annals of Human Biology 6: 59-76
2. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971a The reliability of head film measurements: 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
3. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements: 2 Dentitional angular and linear measures. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 505-517
4. Baumrind S, Miller D, Molthen R 1976 The reliability of head film measurements: 3. Tracing superimposition. American Journal of Orthodontics 70: 617-644
5. Björk A 1963 Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. Journal of Dental Research 42: 400-411
6. Björk A 1969 A prediction of mandibular growth rotation. American Journal of Orthodontics 55: 578-599
7. Björk A, Skieller V 1977 Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. British Journal of Orthodontics 4: 53-64
8. Broadbent B H 1931 A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthodontist 1: 45-66
9. Cangialosi T J, Moss M L, McAlarney M E, Yuan M 1994 An evaluation of growth changes and treatment effects in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with conventional roentgenographic cephalometry and finite element method analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 105: 153-160
10. Chan C K, Tng T T, Hägg U, Cooke M S 1994 Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 106: 487-495.
11. Cohen A M 1984 Uncertainty in cephalometrics. British Journal of Orthodontics 11: 44-48
12. Cook A K, Sellke T A, BeGole E A 1994 The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques: Part II. British Journal of Orthodontics 106: 463-471
13. Doppel D M, Damon W M, Joondeph D R, Little R M 1994 An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 105: 161-168
14. DeCoster L 1953 A new line of reference for the study of lateral facial teleradiographs. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 304-306
15. Ghafari J, Efstratiadis S S 1989 Mandibular displacement and dentitional changes during orthodontic treatment and growth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 95: 12-19
16. Ghafari J, Engel F E, Laster I L 1987 Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base. A review and comparison of four methods. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 91: 403-413
17. Graber T M 1994 Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics: current principles and techniques, 2nd edn. CV Mosby, St Louis
18. Gravely J F, Benzies P M 1974 The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. British Journal of Orthodontics 1: 95-101
19. Healy M J 1958 Variations within individuals in human biology. Human Biology 30: 210-218
20. Hixon E H 1956 The norm concept and cephalometrics. American Journal of Orthodontics 42: 898-906
21. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
22. Houston W J B, Lee R T 1985 Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures. European Journal of Orthodontics 7: 127-135
23. Johnston L E Jr 1986 A comparative analysis of Class II treatments: science and clinical judgement in orthodontics. In: Vig P S, Ribbens K A (eds) Monograph 19, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 103-148
24. Kathopoulis E, Koustas K, Hägg U, Hansen K 1993 Validacion y precision en la identification de los punctos cephalometrics (Accuracy and precision in cephalometrics). In: Aguila J (ed.) Manual de Cefalometrica.. Aguiram, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 3-17
25. Lau Y H, Cooke M S, Hägg U 1997 Effect of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 12: 204-213
26. Nielsen I L 1989 Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 95: 422-431
27. Pancherz H 1982 The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 104-113
28. Pancherz H 1985 The Herbst appliance: its biologic effects and clinical use. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 1-20
29. Pancherz H, Hansen K 1984 The nasion-sella reference line in cephalometry: a methodological study. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 427-434
30. Ricketts R M 1975 A four step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 4: 218-228
31. Savara B S, Tracy W E, Miller P A 1966 Analysis of error in cephalometric measurements of three-dimensional distances on the human mandible. Archives of Oral Biology 11: 209-217
32. Steiner C C1953 Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 729-755
33. Stabrun A E, Danielsen K 1982 Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 185-196
34. Tng T T, Chan T C, Hägg U, Cooke M S 1994 Validity of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on human skulls. European Journal of Orthodontics 16: 110-120
35. Winer B J 1971 Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York