How Much Is Too Much? Media Attention and Popular Support for an Insurgent Party

Political Communication

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 429-445

  Jenkins, Richard W ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Balance; Canada; Election Campaign; Error Correction; News Coverage; Time Series

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033248849     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/105846099198578     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bartels, L. M. (1986). Issue voting under uncertainty. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 709-728.
2. Bartels, L. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Beck, N. (1991). Comparing dynamic specifications: The case of presidential approval. Political Analysis, 3, 51-87.
4. Beck, N. (1993). The methodology of cointegration. Political Analysis, 4, 237-247.
5. Brady, H. E., & Johnston, R. (1987). What’s the primary message: Horse race or issue journalism? In G. R. Orren & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Media and momentum: The New Hampshire primary and nomination politics (pp. 127-186). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
6. Durr, R. H. (1993). An essay on cointegration and error correction models. Political Analysis, 4, 185-227.
7. Fletcher, F. (1987). Mass media and parliamentary elections in Canada. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 341-372.
8. Fletcher, F. (1988). The media and the 1984 landslide. In H. Penniman (Ed.), Canada at the polls, 1984 (pp. 161-189). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Frizzell, A., & Westell, A. (1989). The media and the campaign. In A. Frizzell, J. H. Pammett, & A. Westell (Eds.), The Canadian general election of 1988 (pp. 75-90). Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
10. Graber, D. A. (1989). Mass media and American politics (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
11. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
12. Granger, C. W. J. (1980). Testing for causality: A personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329-352.
13. Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Hackett, R. A., Gilsdorf, W. O., & Savage, P. (1992). News balance rhetoric: The Fraser Institute’s political appropriation of content analysis. Canadian Journal of Communication, 17, 15-36.
15. Hagen, M. G. (1996). Press treatment of front-runners. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 190-219). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
16. Holbrook, T. M. (1996). Do campaigns matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Johnston, R. (in press). Business cycles, political cycles, and the Gallup poll, 1974-97. Canadian Journal of Political Science.
18. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H. E., & Crête, J. (1992). Letting the people decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: McGill-Queen’s Press.
19. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H. E., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (1996, August-September). The 1993 Canadian election campaign: Realignment, dealignment, or something else? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
20. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N., & Brady, H. E. (1994, September). The collapse of a party system? The 1993 Canadian general election. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York City.
21. Judge, G. G., Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., Lütkepohl, H., & Lee, T.-C. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics (2nd ed.). Toronto: Wiley.
22. Kennedy, P. (1997). A guide to econometrics (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Kerbel, M. R. (1994). Edited for television: CNN, ABC, and the 1992 presidential campaign. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24. Lichter, S. R., Amundson, D., & Noyes, R. (1988). The video campaign: Network coverage of the 1988 primaries. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
25. Miljan, L. (1992). The methodology and procedures of the National Media Archive. Canadian Journal of Communication, 17, 95-116.
26. Miljan, L. (1994). Television coverage of the 1993 federal election campaign: A watershed, or business as usual? Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Calgary.
27. Miller, W. L., Sinntag, N., & Broughton, D. (1989). Television in the 1987 British election campaign: Its content and influences. Political Studies, 37, 626-651.
28. Norris, P., & Sanders, D. (1998, September). Does balance matter? Experiments in TV news. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
29. Ostrom, C. W., & Smith, R. M. (1992). Error correction, attitude persistence, and executive rewards and punishments: A behavioral theory of presidential approval. Political Analysis, 4, 127-183.
30. Rhee, J. W. (1996). How polls drive campaign coverage: The Gallup/CNN/OTA Today’s coverage of the 1992 presidential campaign. Political Communication, 13, 213-229.
31. Robinson, M. J., & Sheehan, M. A. (1983). Over the wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in campaign ‘80. New York: Russell Sage.
32. Semetko, H. A., Blumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M., & Weaver, D. H. (1991). The formation of campaign agendas: A comparative analysis of party and media roles in recent American and British elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Zaller, J. (1997). A theory of media politics: The struggle over news in presidential campaigns. Paper presented at the colloquium on “Capturing Campaign Effects,” University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
34. Zaller, J., Hunt, M. (1994). The rise and fall of candidate Perot: Unmediated versus mediated politics—Part I. Political Communication, 11, 357-390.
35. Zaller, J., & Hunt, M. (1995). The rise and fall of candidate Perot: The outsider versus the political system—Part II. Political Communication, 12, 97-123.