A Classroom Demonstration of Potential Biases in the Subjective Interpretation of Projective Tests

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 37-39

  Wiederman, Michael W ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033248440     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2601_7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Beutler L. E. (1995). Issues in selecting an assessment battery. In Beutler L. E. Berren M. R. (eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 65–93). New York: Guilford.
2. Cohen R. J. Swerdlik M. E. Phillips S. M. (1996). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurements (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
3. Dawes R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.
4. Exner J. E. (1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system: Vol. 1. Basic foundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
5. Murray H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Newmark C. S. (ed.). (1996). Major psychological assessment instruments (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Shontz F. C. Green P. (1992). Trends in research on the Rorschach: Review and recommendations. Applied and Preventative Psychology, 1, 149–156.
8. Weiner I. B. (1996). Some observations on the validity of the Rorschach inkblot method. Psychological Assessment, 8, 206–213.