Individual differences in notetaking, summarization, and learning from lectures

Alberta Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-17

  Hadwin, Allyson Fiona ^a   Kirby, John R ^a   Woodhouse, Rosamund A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033246707     PISSN: 00024805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bromage, B.K., & Mayer, R.E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 271-278.
2. Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
3. Cantor, J., Engle, R.W., & Hamilton, G. (1991). Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate? Intelligence, 15, 229-246.
4. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
5. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Education: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 561-584.
6. DiVesta, F.J., & Gray, S.G. (1973). Listening and notetaking II. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 278-287.
7. Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C.A. (1992). Individual differences in reprocessing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 182-192.
8. Hartley, J. (1983). Note-taking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36, 13-14.
9. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 86, 473-493.
10. Jackson, D.N. (1984). Multi-dimensional Aptitude Battery. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
11. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
12. Kiewra, K.A. (1985a). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32.
13. Kiewra, K.A. (1985b). Students' note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor's notes for review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 378-386.
14. Kiewra, K.A., & Benton, S.L. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33-44.
15. Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L., & Lewis, L.B. (1987). Qualitative aspects of notetaking and their relationship with information processing ability. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14, 110-117.
16. Kiewra, K.A., DuBois, N.F., Christian, D., McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 595-597.
17. Kiewra, K.A., DuBois, N.F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991a). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
18. Kiewra, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Christensen, M., Kim, S.I., & Risch, N. (1991b). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 120-123.
19. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note-taking as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Journal, 29, 303-323.
20. Kirby, J.R., & Pedwell, D. (1991). Students' approaches to summarization. Educational Psychology, 11, 297-307.
21. Kirby, J.R., & Woodhouse, R.A. (1994). Measuring and predicting depth of processing in learning. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40, 147-161.
22. Maqsud, M. (1980). Effects of personal lecture notes and teacher-notes on recall of university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 289-294.
23. Mayer, R.E. (1983). Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 40-49.
24. McGinn, M.K. (1991). The effect of generating maps and summaries on subsequent text recall. Unpublished undergraduate thesis. Queen's University.
25. Palincsar, A.M., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
26. Pedhazur, E.J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. New York: CBS College Publishing.
27. Stein, B.L., & Kirby, J.R. (1992). The effects of text absent and text present conditions on summarization and recall of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 217-231.
28. Stephen Jay Gould: Evolution and human equality. (1988). Insight Video.
29. Tirre, W.C., & Pena, C.M. (1992). Investigation of functional working memory in the reading span test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 462-472.
30. Wittrock, M.C., Marks, C., & Doctorow, M. (1975). Reading as a generative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 481-489.
31. Woodhouse, R.A., Kirby, J.R., Simpson, J., & Hadwin, A.F. (1992, June). Effects of text structure and summarization processes on recall. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Quebec City.