Computer-rated essays in the english composition classroom

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 169-187

  Jones, Brett D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033244699     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/07VY-F052-DW3L-CVN2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. S. Elliot, W. Burnham, M. Chernoff, and K. Kern, Computerized Scoring of Open-Ended Bar Examination Questions, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1997.
2. S. Elliot, W. Burnham, M. Chernoff, and K. Kern, Validation of the Computerized Scoring of Open-Ended Assessments, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1997.
3. P. Finn, Computer-Aided Description of Mature Word Choices in Writing, in Evaluating Writing: Describing, Measuring, Judging, C. R. Cooper and L. Odell (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 69-90, 1977.
4. E. B. Page, The Imminence of Grading Essays by Computer, Phi Delta Kappan, 48, pp. 238-243, 1966.
5. E. B. Page, The Use of Computers in Analyzing Student Essays, International Review of Education, 14, pp. 210-221, 1968.
6. E. Roy, Evaluating Placement Exams with a Structured Decision System, Computers and Composition, 9, pp. 71-86, 1992.
7. E. Roy, Computerized Scoring of Placement Exams: A Validation, Journal of Basic Writing, 12, pp. 41-54, 1993.
8. H. Slotnick, Toward a Theory of Computer Essay Grading, Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, pp. 253-263, 1972.
9. E. B. Page, Computer Grading of Student Prose, Using Modern Concepts and Software, Journal of Experimental Education, 62:2, pp. 127-142, 1994.
10. E. B. Page, The Second Blind Test with ETS: PEG Predicts the Graduate Record Exams, paper presented at an Invited Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the AERA/NCME, Chicago, 1997.
11. E. B. Page and N. S. Petersen, The Computer Moves Into Essay Grading: Updating The Ancient Test, Phi Delta Kappan, 76:7, pp. 561-566, 1995.
12. E. B. Page, T. Z. Keith, and M. J. Lavoie, Computer Grading of Essay Traits in Student Writing, paper presented at an Invited Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurements in Education, New York, 1996.
13. M. D. Shermis, H. R. Mzumara, J. Olson, and S. Harrington, On-line Grading of Student Essays: PEG Goes on the Web at IUPUI, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California, 1998.
14. W. Wresch, The Imminence of Grading Essays by Computer - 25 Years Later, Computers and Composition, 10:2, pp. 45-58, 1993.
15. T. Z. Keith, The Computer, Human Judges, and Construct Validity, paper presented at an Invited Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1995.
16. T. Z. Keith, Construct Validity of PEG, paper presented at an Invited Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, 1998.
17. E. B. Page, T. Z. Keith, and M. J. Lavoie, Construct Validity in the Computer Grading of Essays, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, 1995.
18. E. B. Page, J. P. Poggio, and T. Z. Keith, Computer Analysis of Student Essays: Finding Trait Differences in the Student Profile, paper presented at an Invited Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the AERA/NCME, Chicago, 1997.
19. R. Beach, The Effects of Between-Draft Teacher Evaluation Versus Student Self-Evaluation on High School Students' Revising of Rough Drafts, Research in the Teaching of English, 13:2, pp. 111-119, 1979.
20. C. Lynch and P. Klemans, Evaluating Our Evaluations, College English, 40:2, pp. 166-180, 1978.
21. N. D. Ziv, The Effect of Teacher Comments on the Writing of Four College Freshman in New Directions In Composition Research, R. Beach and L. S. Bridwell (eds.), Guilford, New York, pp. 348-380, 1984.
22. R. E. Land and S. Evans, What Our Students Taught Us About Paper Marking, English Journal, 76:2, pp. 113-116, 1987.
23. N. Sommers, Responding to Student Writing, College Composition and Communication, 32:2, pp. 148-156, 1982.
24. M. W. Olson and P. Raffeld, The Effects of Written Comments on the Quality of Student Compositions and the Learning of Content, Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 8, pp. 273-293, 1987.
25. R. Straub, Students' Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study, Research in the Teaching of English, 31:1, pp. 91-119, 1997.
26. W. H. Harris, Teacher Response to Student Writing: A Study of the Response Patterns of High School English Teachers to Determine the Basis for Teacher Judgment of Student Writing, Research in the Teaching of English, 11:2, pp. 175-185, 1977.
27. D. Searle and D. Dillon, The Message of Marking: Teacher Written Responses to Student Writing at Intermediate Grade Levels, Research in the Teaching of English, 14:3, pp. 233-242, 1980.
28. R. J. Connors and A. A. Lunsford, Teachers' Rhetorical Comments on Student Papers, College Composition and Communication, 44:2, pp. 200-223, 1993.
29. P. F. Dickinson, Feedback That Works: Using the Computer to Respond, paper presented at the 4th National Basic Writing Conference, University of Maryland at College Park, 1992.
30. E. A. Flynn, Students as Readers of Their Classmates' Writing: Some Implications for Peer Critiquing, The Writing Instructor, 3:3, pp. 120-128, 1984.
31. L. Beason, Feedback and Revision in Writing Across the Curriculum Classes, Research in the Teaching of English, 27:4, pp. 395-422, 1993.
32. R. P. Yagelski, The Role of Classroom Context in the Revision Strategies of Student Writers, Research in the Teaching of English, 29:2, pp. 216-238, 1995.