Legal Issues in Anonymity and Pseudonymity

Information Society

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 113-127

  Froomkin, A Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Anonymity; First Amendment; Freedom of speech; Pseudonymity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033244313     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019722499128574     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anonymous. 1961. Note, The constitutional right to anonymity: Free speech, disclosure and the devil. Yale Law Journal 70:1084-1128.
2. Ash, Timothy Garton. 1997. The file: A personal history. New York: Random House.
3. Burk, Dan L. 1997. How state regulation of the Internet violates the Commerce Clause. Cato Journal 17:147-161.
4. Cohen, Julie E. 1996. A right to read anonymously: A closer look at “copyright management” in cyberspace. Connecticut Law Review 28:981-1039.
5. DeLong, J. Bradford, and A. Michael Froomkin. In press. The next economy In Internet publishing and beyond: The economics of digital information and intellectual property. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available online [http://www.law.miami.edu/~ froomkin/ articles/newecon.html].
6. Elster, Jon. 1989. The cement of society: A study of social order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Froomkin, A. Michael. 1995. The metaphor is the key: Cryptography, the Clipper chip, and the Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143:709-897. Also available online [http://www.law. miami.edu/ froomkin/articles/clipper.htm].
8. Froomkin, A. Michael. 1996. Flood control on the information ocean: Living with anonymity, digital cash, and distributed databases. Journal of Law &Comp. 15:395-507. Also available online [http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/ocean.htm].
9. Froomkin, A. Michael. 1997. The Internet as a source of regulatory arbitrage. In Borders in cyberspace, eds. Brian Kahin and Charles Nesson, pp. 129-163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Also available online [http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/arbitr. htm].
10. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The social virtues &creation ofpros-perity. New York: Free Press.
11. Karnow, Curtis E. A. 1994. The encrypted self: Fleshing out the rights of electronic personalities. John Marshall Journal of Computer &Information Law 13:1-16.
12. Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and power. (trans. Howard Davis, John Raffan and Kathryn Rooney). New York: Wiley.
13. Nock, Stephen. 1993. The costs ofprivacy. New York: A. De Gruyter.
14. Norton, Richard K. 1996. Note, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission: Defining the right to engage in anonymous political speech. North Carolina Law Review 74:553.
15. Parker, Michael M. 1992. Fax pas: Stopping the junk fax mail bandwagon. Oregon Law Review 71:457-496.
16. Rey, Oscar E. 1991. Note, Antimask laws: Exploring the outer bounds of protected speech under the First Amendment—State v. Miller, 260 Ga. 669, 398 S.E.2d 547 (1990). Washington Law Review 66: 1139-1158.
17. Schauer, Frederick. 1978. Fear, risk and the First Amendment: Unravelling the “chilling effect.” Boston University Law Review 58: 685-732.
18. Steele, Lisa J. 1991. The view from on high: Satellite remote sensing technology and the Fourth Amendment. High Tech Law Journal 6:327-333.
19. Stone, Geoffrey R. 1987. Content-neutral restrictions. University of Chicago Law Review 54:46-118.