Free recall as a test of reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 11-22

  Carlisle, Joanne F ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033242639     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511148     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Calfee, R., & Hiebert, E. (1991). Classroom assessment of reading. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 2 (pp. 281-309). New York: Longman.
2. Carlisle, J.F. (1989). Diagnosing comprehension deficits through listening and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 159-176.
3. Carlisle, J.F. (1991). Language comprehension and text structure. In J.F. Kavanagh (Ed.), The language continuum: From infanties and their teachers. Journal of Special Education, 30, 18-34.
4. Carlisle, J.F., " Felbinger, L. (1991). Profiles of listening and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 345-354.
5. Davey, B. (1987). Postpassage questions: Task and reader effects on comprehension and metacomprehension processes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 261-285.
6. Feagans, L., & Short, E.J. (1984). Developmental differences in the comprehension and production of narratives by reading-disabled and normally achieving children. Child Development, 55, 1727-1736.
7. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading of comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
8. Horowitz, R., " Samuels, S.J. (1985). Reading and listening to expository text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 185-197.
9. Johnson, D.J., & Grant, J.O. (1989). Written narratives of normal and learning disabled children. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 140-158.
10. Johnston, P.H. (1983). Reading comprehension assessment: A cognitive basis. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11. Johnston, P.H. (1984). Assessment in reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 147-182). New York: Longman.
12. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
13. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (1990). Qualitative Reading Inventory. Glenview, IL: Harper Collins Publisher.
14. Mallinson, G.G., Mallinson, J.B., Smallwood, W.L., & Valentino, C. (1985). Silver Burdett Science (Grade 6 and 8 books). Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Science.
15. Mandler, J.M., & DeForest, M. (1979). Is there more than one way to recall a story? Child Development, 50, 886-889.
16. Meyer, B.J.F. (1984). Organizational aspects of text: Effects on reading comprehension and applications for the classroom. In J. Flood (Ed.), Promoting reading comprehension (pp. 113-138). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17. Meyer, B.J.F., Brandt, D.M., & Bluth, G.J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
18. Montague, M., Maddux, C.D., & Dereshiwsky, M.I. (1990). Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 190-197.
19. Morrow, L.M. (1988). Retelling stories as a diagnostic tool. In S.M. Glazer, L.W. Searfoss, & L.M. Gentile (Eds.), Re-examining reading diagnosis (pp. 128-149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
20. Newcomer, P.L., Barenbaum, E.M., & Nodine, B.F. (1988). Comparison of the story production of LD, normal achieving, and low-achieving children under two modes of production. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 82-96.
21. Rasool, J.M., & Royer, J.M. (1986). Assessment of reading comprehension using the sentence verification technique: Evidence from narrative and descriptive texts. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 180-184.
22. Roller, C.M. (1990). The interaction between knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 79-89.
23. Roth, F.P., & Spekman, N. J. (1986). Narrative discourse: Spontaneously generated stories of learning-disabled and normally achieving students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 8-23.
24. Royer, J.M. (1986). The sentence verification technique as a measure of comprehension: Validity, reliability and practicality. Unpublished paper, The University of Massachusetts.
25. Royer , J.M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1981). On the theory and measurement of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 187-216.
26. Royer, J.M., Kulhavy, R.W., Lee, J.B., & Peterson, S.E. (1986). The sentence verification technique as a measure of listening and reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Research, 6, 299-314.
27. Royer, J.M., Lynch., D.J., Hambleton, R.K., & Bulgarelli, C. (1984). Using sentence verification technique to assess the comprehension of technical text as a function of level of expertise. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 839-869.
28. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E.T., Olivarez, A., Lee, S., & Roberts, N.M. (1990). Imagination in story reading: The role of imagery, verbal recall, story analysis, and processing levels. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 55-70.
29. Salvia, J., & Hughes, C. (1990). Curriculum-based assessment: Testing what is taught. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
30. Samuels, S.J. (1987). Factors that influence listening and reading comprehension. In R. Horowitz & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 295-325). New York: Academic Press.
31. Smiley, S S., Oakley, D.D., Worthen, D., Campione, J.C., & Brown, A. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 381-387.
32. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
33. Talbott, E., Lloyd, J.W., & Tankersley, M. (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223-232.
34. Taylor, B.M., & Samuels, S.J. (1983). Children's use of text structure in the recall of expository material. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 517-528.
35. Valencia, S.W., Stallman, A.C., Commeyras, M., Pearson, P.D., & Hartman, D.K. (1991). Four measures of topical knowledge: A study of construct knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 204-233.
36. Weaver, P., & Dickinson, D. (1982). Scratching below the surface: Exploring the usefulness of story grammar. Discourse Processes, 5, 225-244.
37. Weber, R. (1990). The construction of narratives by good and poor readers. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literary theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms (pp. 295-301). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
38. Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Co.
39. Woodward, J., & Noell, J. (1991). Science instruction at the secondary level: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 277-284.
40. Worden, P. (1986). Prose comprehension and recall in disabled learners. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neurological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 241-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Worden, P.E., Malmgren, I., & Gabourie, P. (1982). Memory for stories in learning disabled adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities 15, 145-152.