Incorporating recent advances in measurement in sport and exercise psychology

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 24-38

  Fletcher, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Classical test theory; Item response theory; Measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033241398     PISSN: 08952779     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.21.1.24     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
2. Cole, E., Wood, T.M., & Dunn, J.M. (1991). Item response theory: A useful application for adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 317-332.
3. De Ayala, R.J. (1993). An introduction to polytomous items response theory models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 172-189.
4. Disch, J. (1987). Recent development in measurement and possible applications to the measurement of psychomotor behavior: A response. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(3), 210-212.
5. Hambleton, R.K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (Vol. 3, pp. 147-200). New York: MacMillan.
6. Hambleton, R.K., & Jones, R.W. (1996). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38-47.
7. Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff.
8. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage.
9. Hambleton, R.K., & van der Linden, W.J. (1982). Advances in item response theory and applications: An introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 373-378.
10. Li, H.H., & Stout, W. (1995, April). A version of DIMTEST to assess latent trait unidimensionality for mixed polytomous and dichotomous item response data. Paper presented at the NCME Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
11. Marsh, H.W., Richards, G.E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical self-description questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations with existing instruments. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 15, 270-305.
12. Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-17.
13. Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1998). BILOG 3: Item and test scoring with binary logistic models (Version 3). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
14. Safrit, M.J. (1987). The applicability of item response theory to tests of motor behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(3), 213-215.
15. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monographs, 17.
16. Spray, J.A. (1987). Recent developments in measurement and possible applications to the measurement of psychomotor behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(3), 203-209.
17. Spray, J.A. (1989). New approaches to solving measurement problems. In M.J. Safrit & T.M. Wood (Eds.), Measurement concepts in physical education and exercise science (pp. 229-248). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
18. Stout, W., Douglas, J., Junker, B., & Roussos, L. (1993). DIMTEST manual. Champaign: Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
19. Stout, W.F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 55(2), 293-325.
20. Theunissen, T.J.J.M. (1986). Some applications of optimization algorithms in test design and adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(4), 381-389.
21. Thissen, D. (1990). MULTILOG user's guide (Version 2). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
22. Timminga, E., van der Linden, W.J., & Schweitzer, D.A. (1996). CONTEST (Version 2). Groningen, Netherlands: ProGAMMA.
23. Wainer, H., Dorans, N.J., Flaughter, R., Green, B.F., Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Wingersky, M.S., Barton, M.A., & Lord, F.M. (1982). LOGIST users guide. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
25. Wood, T.M. (1987). Putting item response theory into perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(3), 216-220.