Prey choice and spider fitness

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 301-307

  Toft, Søren ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033239627     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Alderweireldt, M. 1994. Prey selection and prey capture strategies of linyphiid spiders in high-input agricultural fields. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 9: 300-308.
2. Bernays, E.A. 1993. Aversion learning and feeding. Pp. 1-17. In Insect Learning. Ecology and Evolutionary Perspectives. (D.R. Papaj & A.C. Lewis, eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Bilde, T. & S. Toft. 1994. Prey preference and egg production of the carabid beetle Agonum dorsale. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 73:151-156.
4. Bilde, T. & S. Toft. 1997a. Limited predation capacity by generalist arthropod predators on the cereal aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi. Biol. Agric. Hort., 15:143-150.
5. Bilde, T. & S. Toft. 1997b. Consumption by carabid beetles of three cereal aphid species relative to other prey types. Entomophaga, 42:21-32.
6. Endler, J.A. 1991. Interactions between predators and prey. Pp. 169-196. In Behavioral Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach (J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies, eds.). Blackwell, Oxford.
7. Greenstone, M.H. 1979. Spider feeding behaviour optimises dietary essential amino acid composition. Nature, 282:501-503.
8. Malcolm, S.B. 1992. Prey defence and predator foraging. Pp. 458-489. In Natural enemies (M.J. Crawley, ed.). Blackwell, Oxford.
9. Marcussen, B., J.A. Axelsen & S. Toft. In press. The value of two collembola species as food for a cereal spider. Entomol. Exp. Appl.
10. Miyashita, K. 1968. Growth and development of Lycosa T-insignita Boes. et Str. (Araneae: Lycosidae) under different feeding conditions. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 3:81-88.
11. Morse, D.H. & E.G. Stephens. 1996. The consequences of adult foraging success on the components of lifetime fitness in a semelparous, sit and wait predator. Evol. Ecol., 10:361-373.
12. Nentwig, W. 1985. Spiders eat crickets artificially poisoned with KCN and change the composition of their digestive fluid. Naturwissenschaften, 72: 545-546.
13. Nentwig, W. 1987. The prey of spiders. Pp. 249-263. In Ecophysiology of Spiders (W. Nentwig, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
14. Nyffeler, M. & G. Benz. 1988a. Feeding ecology and predatory importance of wolf spiders (Pardosa spp.) (Araneae, Lycosidae) in winter wheat fields. J. Appl. Entomol., 106:123-134.
15. Nyffeler, M. & G. Benz. 1988b. Prey and predatory importance of micryphantid spiders in winter wheat fields and hay meadows. J. Appl. Entomol., 105:190-197.
16. Onkonbury, J. & D.R. Formanowicz. 1997. Prey choice by predators: effect of prey vulnerability. Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 9:19-25.
17. Pastorok, R.A. 1981. Prey vulnerability and size selection by Chaoborus larvae. Ecology, 62: 1311-1324.
18. Riechert, S.E. 1981. The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. American Nat., 117:871-892.
19. Riechert, S.E. 1991. Prey abundance vs. diet breadth in a spider test system. Evol. Ecol., 5: 327-338.
20. Riechert, S.E. & J.M. Harp. 1987. Nutritional ecology of spiders. Pp. 645-672. In Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders and Related Invertebrates (F. Slansky & J.G. Rodriguez, eds.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
21. Riechert, S.E. & J. Luczak. 1982. Spider foraging: behavioral responses to prey. Pp. 353-385. In Spider Communication. Mechanisms and Ecological Significance (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
22. Sih, A. & R.D. Moore. 1990. Interacting effects of predator and prey behaviour in determining diets. Pp. 771-796. In Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection (R.N. Hughes, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
23. Slansky, F. & J.M. Scriber. 1985. Nutrition. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Vol. 4. Regulation, Digestion, Nutrition, Excretion (G.A. Kerkut & L.I. Gilbert, eds.). Pergamon Press, Oxford.
24. Sunderland, K.D. 1987. Spiders and cereal aphids in Europe. SROP/WPRS Bull., 10:82-102.
25. Sunderland, K.D., A.M. Fraser & A.F.G. Dixon. 1986. Distribution of linyphiid spiders in relation to capture of prey in cereal fields. Pedobiologia, 29:367-375.
26. Sunderland, K.D., N.E. Crook, D.L. Stacey & B.J. Fuller. 1987. A study of feeding by polyphagous predators on cereal aphids using ELISA and gut dissection. J. Appl. Ecol. 24:907-933.
27. Sunderland, K.D., T. Bilde, L.J.M.F. den Nijs, A. Dinter, U. Heimbach, J.A. Lys, W. Powell & S. Toft. 1996a. Reproduction of beneficial predators and parasitoids in agroecosystems in relation to habitat quality and food availability. Pp. 117-153. In Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land. II. Survival, reproduction and enhancement (K. Booij & L. den Nijs, eds.). Aarhus Univ. Press, Århus.
28. Sunderland, K.D., C.J. Topping, S. Ellis, S. Long, S. Van de Laak & M. Else. 1996b. Reproduction and survival of linyphiid spiders, with special reference to Lepthyphantes tenuis (Blackwall). Pp. 81-95. In Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land. II. Survival, reproduction and enhancement (K. Booij & L. den Nijs, eds.). Aarhus Univ. Press, Århus.
29. Toft, S. 1989. Aspects of the ground-living spider fauna of two barley fields in Denmark: species richness and phenological synchronization. Entomol. Meddr., 57:157-168.
30. Toft, S. 1995. Value of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi as food for cereal spiders. J. Appl. Ecol., 32:552-560.
31. Toft, S. 1996. Indicators of prey quality for arthropod predators. Pp. 107-116. In Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land. II. Survival, reproduction and enhancement (K. Booij & L. den Nijs, eds.). Aarhus Univ. Press, Århus.
32. Toft, S. 1997. Acquired food aversion of a wolf spider to three cereal aphids: intra-and interspecific effects. Entomophaga, 42:63-69.
33. Toft, S. & D.H. Wise. 1999a. Growth, development and survival of a generalist predator fed single-and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia, 119:191-197.
34. Toft, S. & D.H. Wise. 1999b. Behavioral and ecophysiological responses of a generalist predator fed single-and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia, 119:198-207.
35. Turnbull, A.L. 1960. The prey of the spider Linyphia triangularis (Clerck) (Araneae, Linyphiidae). Canadian J. Zool., 38:859-873.
36. Uetz, G., J. Bischoff & J. Raver. 1992. Survivorship of wolf spiders (Lycosidae) reared on different diets. J. Arachnol., 20:207-211.
37. Waldbauer, G.P. & S. Friedman. 1991. Self-selection of optimal diets by insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 36:43-63.
38. Wise, D.H. 1993. Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.