Hypotheses for the recent Hispaniolan spider fauna based on the Dominican Republic Amber spider fauna

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 64-70

  Penney, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033239587     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alayón-Garcia, G. 1992. El género Tugana (Arachnida, Araneae, Amaurobiidae). Poeyana. 416:1-8.
2. Ausserer, A. 1867. Die Arachniden Tirols nach ihrer horizontalen und verticalen Verbreitung, 1. Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 17:137-170.
3. Ausserer, A. 1871. Beiträge zur kenntniss der Arachniden-Familie der Territelariae Thorell (Mygalidae Autor). Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 21: 117-224.
4. Banks, N. 1902. Some spiders and mites from the Bermuda Islands. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 11:267-275.
5. Banks, N. 1903. A list of Arachnida from Hayti, with descriptions of new species. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 55:340-345.
6. Bertkau, P. 1878. Versuch einer natürlichen Anordnung der Spinnen, nebst Bemerkungen zu eingelnen Gattungen. Arch. Naturg. (Berlin), 44: 351-410.
7. Blackwall, J. 1862. Descriptions of newly-discovered spiders from the Island of Madeira. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (Ser. 3), 9:370-382.
8. Blackwall, J. 1864. A history of the spiders of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 2. Ray Society, London, 209 pp.
9. Bryant, E.B. 1940. Cuban spiders in the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 86:247-554.
10. Bryant, E.B. 1943. The Salticid spiders of Hispaniola. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 92:445-521.
11. Bryant, E.B. 1945. The Argiopidae of Hispaniola. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 95:357-442.
12. Bryant, E.B. 1948. The spiders of Hispaniola. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 100:331-459.
13. Coddington, J.A., C.E. Griswold, D.S. Dávila, E. Peñaranda & S.F. Larcher. 1991. Designing and testing sampling protocols to estimate biodiversity in tropical ecosystems. Pp. 44-60, In The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proc. Intern. Cong. Syst. Evol. Biol. (E.C. Dudley, ed.). Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
14. Coffin, M.F. & P.D. Rabinowitz. 1987. Reconstruction of Madagascar and Africa: evidence from the Davie Fracture Zone and Western Somali Basin. J. Geophys. Res., 92:9385-9406.
15. Decae, A.E. 1986. Cyrtocarenum Ausserer, 1871, a living fossil? Pp. 39-44, In Proc. Ninth Intern. Cong. Arachnol. (Eberhard, W.G., Y.D. Lubin & B.C. Robinson, eds.). Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C.
16. Dippenaar-Schoeman, A. & R. Jocqué. 1997. African Spiders. An Identification Manual. Agric. Res. Council. South Africa. 392 pp.
17. Eldredge, N. 1985. Time Frames. Simon & Schuster, New York. 240 pp.
18. Eskov, K.Y. 1987. A new archaeid spider (Chelicerata. Araneae) from the Jurassic of Kazakhstan, with notes on the so-called "Gondwanan" ranges of Recent taxa. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 175(1):81-106.
19. Eskov, K.Y. 1990. Spider palaeontology: present trends and future expectations. Acta Zool. Fennica, 190:123-127.
20. Eskov, K.Y. 1992. Archaeid spiders from Eocene Baltic amber (Chelicerata, Araneida, Archaeidae) with remarks on the so-called "Gondwanan" ranges of Recent taxa. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 185(3):311-328.
21. Eskov, K.Y. & S.I. Golovatch. 1986. On the origin of trans-Pacific disjunctions. Zool. Jb. Syst., Jena, 113(2):265-285.
22. Fage, L. 1912. Etudes sur les araignées cavernicoles. 1. Révision des Ochyroceratidae (n. fam.). Biospelogica, 29. Arch. Zool. Exper. et Gen., 10: 97-162.
23. Forster, R.R. & N.I. Platnick. 1984. A review of archeaid spiders and their relatives, with notes on the limits of the superfamily Palpimanoidea (Arachnida, Araneae). Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist., 178:1-106.
24. Grimaldi, D.A. 1996. Amber: Window to the Past. Harry N. Abrahams, Inc., New York. 216 pp.
25. Hentz, N.M. 1842. Descriptions and figures of the Araneides of the United States. Boston J. Nat. Hist., 4:54-57; 223-231.
26. Hewitt, J. 1919. Description of new South African spiders and solifuge of the genus Chelypus. Rec. Albany Mus., 3:196-215.
27. Hickman, V.V. 1931. A new family of spiders. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1931:1321-1328.
28. Iturralde-Vinent, M.A. & R.D.E. MacPhee. 1996. Age and palaeogeographical origin of Dominican amber. Science, Washington, 273:1850-1852.
29. Koch, C.L. 1851. Uebersicht des Arachnidensystems. Vol. 5. Nurenberg, 104 pp.
30. Koch, C.L. & G.C. Berendt. 1854. Die im Bernstein befindlichen Crustaceen, Myriapoden, Arachniden und Apteren der Vorwelt. Berlin, 124 pp.
31. Koch, L. 1866. Die Arachniden-Familie der Drassiden. Parts 1-6. Nurenberg, 304 pp.
32. Lotz, L.N. 1996. Afrotropical Archaeidae (Araneae): 1. New species of Afrarchaea with notes on Afrarchaea godfreyi (Hewitt, 1919). Navors. nas. Mus., Bloemfontein, 12(5):141-160.
33. Macleay, W.S. 1839. On some new forms of Arachnida. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (Ser. 1), 2:1-14.
34. MacPhee, R.D.E. & M.A. Iturralde-Vinent. 1995. Origin of the Greater Antillean land mammal fauna, 1: new Tertiary fossils from Cuba and Puerto Rico. American Mus. Nov., 3141:1-30.
35. Penney, D. 1999. Dominican Republic amber spiders and their contribution to fossil and Recent ecology. Unpubl. PhD thesis, Univ. Manchester. 377 pp.
36. Petrunkevitch, A. 1928. The Antillean spider fauna - a study in geographic isolation. Science, Washington, 68(1774):650.
37. Pickard-Cambridge, O. 1871. Arachnida. Zool. Rec., 7:207-224.
38. Pickard-Cambridge, O. 1873. On some new genera and species of Araneida. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1873:112-129.
39. Platnick, N.I. 1989. Advances in spider taxonomy 1981-1987. A supplement to Brignoli's A Catalogue of the Araneae described between 1940 and 1981. Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester. 673 pp.
40. Platnick, N.I. 1993. Advances in spider taxonomy 1988-1991 with synonymies and transfers 1940-1980. New York Entomol. Soc., New York. 846 pp.
41. Platnick, N.I. 1997. Advances in spider taxonomy 1992-1995 with redescriptions 1940-1980. New York Entomol. Soc., New York. 976 pp.
42. Pocock, R.I. 1895. Description of two new spiders obtained by Messrs. J.J. Quelch and F. MacConnel on the summit of Mount Roraima, in Demerara; with a note upon the systematic position of the genus Desis. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (Ser. 6), 16:139-143.
43. Pocock, R.I. 1903. On the geographical distribution of spiders of the order Mygalomorphae. Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 1903(1):340-368.
44. Poinar, G.O., Jr. 1992. Life in Amber. Stanford Univ. Press, California. 350 pp.
45. Prell, W.L., J.V. Gardner, A.W.H. Be & J.D. Hays. 1976. Equatorial Atlantic and Caribbean foraminiferal assemblages, temperatures and circulation: interglacial and glacial comparisons. Geol. Soc. America Mem., 145:247-266.
46. Prószyński, J. 1986. What, if anything, is a genus in Salticidae (Araneae). Pp 367-372. In Actas X Congresso Internacional de Aracnologia, Jaca (España). Vol. 1. (J.A. Barrientos. ed.). Barcelona.
47. Roewer, C.F. 1942. Katalog der Araneae von 1758 bis 1940, Vol. 1. Bremen. 1040 pp.
48. Ross, M.I. & C.R. Scotese. 1988. A hierarchical tectonic model of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region. Tectonophysics. 155:139-168.
49. Schawaller, W. 1981. Übersicht über Spinnen-Familien im Dominikanischen Bernstein und anderen tertiären Harzen (Stuttgarter Bernsteinsammlung: Arachnida, Araneae). Stuttgarter Beitr. Naturk. Ser. B (Geol. und Paläont.), 77:1-10.
50. Schubert, C. 1988. Climatic changes during the last glacial maximum in northern South America and the Caribbean: a review. Interciencia, 13(3): 128-137.
51. Shear, W.A. 1970. The spider family Oecobiidae in North America, Mexico, and the West Indies. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 140:129-164.
52. e Mémoire, 20. Descriptions d'espèces et de genres nouveaux de la famille des Dysderidae. Ann. Soc. Entomol. France, 2(6):201-240.
53. e Mémoire. Ann. Soc. Entomol. France, 9(6): 169-220.
54. e Mémoire. 34. Etude sur les Arachnides de l'Yemen. Ann. Soc. Entomol. France, 10(6):77-124.
55. Simon, E. 1892. Histoire Naturelle des Araignées. Vol. 1, part 1. Paris, pp. 1-256.
56. Simon, E. 1893. Histoire Naturelle des Araignées. Vol. 1, part 2. Paris, pp. 257-488.
57. Simon, E. 1894. Histoire Naturelle des Araignées. Vol. 1, part 3. Paris, pp. 489-760.
58. Simon, E. 1895. Histoire Naturelle des Araignées. Vol. 1, part 4. Paris, pp. 761-1084.
59. Simon, E. 1922. Description de deux Arachnides cavernicoles do midi de la France. Bull. Soc. Entomol. France, 15:199-200.
60. Stanley, S.M. 1985. Rates of evolution. Palaeobiology, 11 (1):13-26.
61. Templeton, R. 1835. On the spiders of the genus Dysdera Latr. with the description of a new allied genus. Zool. J. London, 5:400-408.
62. Thorell, T. 1869. On European spiders. Part 1. Review of the European genera of spiders, preceeded by some observations on zoological nomenclature. N. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsala, 7(3): 1-108.
63. Thorell, T. 1870. On European spiders. N. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsala, 7(3): 109-242.
64. Thorell, T. 1887. Viaggio di L. Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. 2. Primo saggio sui Ragni birmani. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat., 5(2):5-417.
65. Wagner, W.A. 1887. Copulations organe des Männchens als Criterium für die Systematik der Spinnen. Mém. Soc. Entomol. Russia. 22:3-132.
66. Wunderlich, J. 1988. Die Fossilen Spinnen im Dominikanischen Bernstein. Beitr. Araneol., 2:1-378.
67. Wunderlich, J. 1994. Bemerkenswerte Spinnen der rezenten und fossilen Faunen Mitteleuropas und ihre biogeographischen Beziehungen zu den Tropen und Subtropen (Arachnida, Araneae). Arachnol. Mitt., 7:53-55.
68. Wunderlich, J. 1998. Beschreibung der ersten fossilen Spinnen der Unterfamilien Mysmeninae (Anapidae) und Erigoninae (Linyphiidae) im Dominikanischen Bernstein (Arachnida. Araneae). Entomol. Z., 108(9):363-367.