Science education and the commonplaces of science

Science Education

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 233-245

  Helms, Jenifer V ^a   Carlone, Heidi B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033239036     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<233::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.
3. Atwater, M. (1994). Research on cultural diversity in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 558-576). New York: Macmillan.
4. Barnes, B., & Shapin, S. (Eds.) (1979). Natural order: Historical studies of scientific culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
6. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62.
7. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage.
8. California Department of Education (1990). Science framework for California public schools kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA. CDE.
9. Callon, M. (1995). Four models for the dynamics of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 29-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Chalmers, A. (1982). What is this thing called science? Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
11. Cobern, W. (1995). Science education as an exercise in foreign affairs. Science and Education, 4, 287-302.
12. Collins, H. M., & Shapin, S. (1989). Experiment, science teaching, and the new history and sociology of science. In M. Shortland & A. Warwick (Eds.), Teaching the history of science (pp. 67-79). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
13. Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cozzens, S., & Woodhouse, E. (1995). Science, government, and the politics of knowledge. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 533-553). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Cunningham, C. M. (1995). The effect of teachers' sociological understanding of science on classroom practice and curriculum innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
16. Cunningham, C. M., & Helms, J. (1998). Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 483-499.
17. Dickson, D. (1988). The new politics of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
18. Duschl, R. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Duschl, R. (1994). Research on the history and philosophy of science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching (pp. 443-465). New York: Macmillan.
20. Duschl, R., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467-501.
21. Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121-133.
22. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
23. Gieryn, T. (1995). Boundaries of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 393-443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Good, R. (1995). Comments on multicultural science education. Science Education, 79, 335-336.
25. Haraway, D. (1990). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
26. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.
27. Harding, S. (1989). Is there a feminist method? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 17-32). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
28. Harding, S. (1990). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
29. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Kelly, G., Carlsen, W., & Cunningham, C. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77, 207-220.
31. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Krugly-Smolska, E. (1996). Scientific culture, multiculturalism and the science classroom. Science and Education, 5, 21-29.
33. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conception of the nature of science: A review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
37. Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Loving, C. (1995). Comment on "multiculturalism, universalism, and science education." Science Education, 79, 341-348.
39. Matthews, M. (1991). History, philosophy, and science teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.
41. Meichtry, Y. J. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 429-443.
42. Millar, R. (1994). What is 'scientific method' and can it be taught? In R. Levinson (Ed.), Teaching science (pp. 164-177). London: Routledge.
43. Millar, R. (1997). Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve? In R. Levinson & J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis? (pp. 87-101). New York: Routledge.
44. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. Restivo, S. (1988). Modern science as a social problem. Social Problems, 35, 206-225.
46. Restivo, S. (1994). Science, society, and values: Toward a sociology of objectivity. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.
47. Schwab, J. J. (1978). Science, curriculum, and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Shapin, S. (1984). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle's literary technology. Social Studies of Science, 14, 481-520.
49. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.)(1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Solomon, J. (1994). Conflict between mainstream science and STS in science education. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspective on reform (pp. 3-10). New York: Teachers College Press.
51. Southerland, S. A. (1996). Acknowledging student agency: Multiculturalism, scientism, and science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
52. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78, 387-398.
53. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Yager, R. (Ed.)(1996) Science/technology/society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
55. Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1987). Science teachers' conception of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71, 721-734.