Networks of law encoding diagrams for understanding science

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 167-184

  Cheng, Peter C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033238923     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03172964     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cheng, P.C-H. (1993). Multiple interactive structural representation systems for education. In R. Cox, M. Petre, P. Brna, & J. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop of Graphical Representations, Reasoning and Communication of the AI-ED 93 World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 25-28). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
2. Cheng, P.C-H. (1996a). Scientific discovery with law encoding diagrams. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 145-162.
3. Cheng, P.C-H. (1996b). Law encoding diagrams for instructional systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7, 33-74.
4. Cheng, P.C-H. (1996c). Learning qualitative relations in physics with law encoding diagrams. In G.W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceeding of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 512-517). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cheng, P.C-H. (1997). Components of a cognitive theory of problem solving and discovery with law encoding diagrams. In M. Anderson (Ed.), AAAI Fall Symposium: Reasoning with Diagrammatic Representations II (pp. 85-93). Cambridge, MA: AAAI.
6. Cheng, P.C-H. (1998). A framework for scientific reasoning with law encoding diagrams: Analysing protocols to assess its utility. In M.A. Gernsbacher & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 232-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cheng, P.C-H., & Simon, H.A. (1992). The right representation for discovery: Finding the conservation of momentum. In D. Sleeman & P. Edwards (Eds.), Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (ML92) (pp. 62-71). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Cheng, P.C-H., & Simon, H.A. (1995). Scientific Discovery and Creative Reasoning with Diagrams. In S. Smith, T. Ward, & R. Finke (Eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach (pp. 205-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
10. Ellis, H.C., & Hunt, R.R. (1993). Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology (5th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
11. Giere, R.N. (1994). The cognitive structures of scientific theories. Philosophy of Science, 61, 276-296.
12. Kaput, J.J. (1992). Technology and Mathematics Education. In D.A. Grouws (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 515-556). New York, NY: MacMillan.
13. Kindfield, A.C.H. (1994). Biology diagrams: Tools to think with. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 1-36.
14. Koedinger, K.R., & Anderson, J.R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511-550.
15. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., & Zytkow, J.M. (1987). Scientific Discovery: Computation Explorations of the Creative Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Larkin, J.H., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317-345.
17. Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
18. Michener, E.R. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2, 361-383.
19. Reif (1987). Interpretation of scientific or mathematical concepts: Cognitive issues and instructional implications. Cognitive Science, 11, 395-416.
20. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
21. White, B. (1989). The role of intermediate abstractions in understanding science and mathematics. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 972-979). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 99-157.