Spatial representativeness and scales of transport during the 1995 integrated monitoring study in California's San Joaquin Valley

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 33, Issue 29, 1999, Pages 4775-4786

  Blanchard, Charles L ^a   Carr, Edward L ^b   Collins, John F ^c   Smith, Ted B ^d   Lehrman, Donald E ^d   Michaels, Harvey M ^a  

^a Envair   (United States)

^b Systems Applications Inc   (United States)

^c University of California   (United States)

^d Technical and Business Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Background concentration; California; Particulate matter; Range of influence; San Joaquin Valley; Spatial representativeness; Stagnation; Transport

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION; CLIMATE CHANGE; MASS TRANSFER; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

SECONDARY AEROSOLS;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY;

PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; POLLUTION MONITORING;

AEROSOL; AIR MONITORING; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT; BOUNDARY LAYER; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEASONAL VARIATION; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033237875     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00284-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 10 source contributions in Rubidoux. Atmospheric Environment. 26A:1992;693-706.
2. 10 source apportionment in California's San Joaquin Valley. Atmospheric Environment. 26A:1992;3335-3354.
3. 2.5 compositions in California's San Joaquin Valley. Aerosol Science and Technology. 18:1993;105-128.
4. 2.5: A Fine Patricle Standard. Air Waste Management Association, pp. 59-77. Pittsburgh, PA.
5. Hogo, H., Gery, M.W., 1988. Guidelines for Using OZIPM-4 with CBM-IV or Optional Mechanisms. Report prepared by Systems Applications International, San Rafael, CA (SYSAPP-88/001).
6. Irwin J.S. Estimating plume dispersion - a comparison of several sigma schemes. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology. 22:1983;92-114.
7. Kumar, N., Lurmann, F.W., Pandis, S., 1998. Analysis of atmospheric chemistry during 1995 integrated monitoring study. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
8. Lehrman, D.E., Smith, T.B., Knuth, W.R., 1998. Integrated Monitoring Study Data Analysis: Meteorological representativeness, and Fog and Low Clouds Characteristics. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
9. Ludwig, F.L., Javitz, H.S., Valdes, A., 1983. How many stations are required to estimate the design value and the expected number of exceedances of the ozone standard in an urban area? Journal of Air Pollution Control Association 33, 963-967.
10. Petersen, W.B., Lavdas, L.G., INPUFF 2.0 - a multiple source Gaussian puff dispersion algorithm. EPA-600/8-86/024. US EPA, Research Triangle Park, 1986.
11. SAI., 1996. User's guide to the regulatory modeling system for aerosols and deposition (REMSAD). Report prepared by Systems Applications International, San Rafael, CA 94903 (SYSAPP-96/42).
12. Smith, T.B., Lehrman, D.E., Reible, D.D., Shair, F.H., 1981. The origin and fate of airborne pollutants within the San Joaquin Valley. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
13. 10 loading. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
14. Solomon, P.A., Thuillier, R.H., Magliano, K.L., Ranzieri, A.J., Hackney, R., Niccum, E., Watson, J.G., Lehrman, D., Roth, P.M., Ziman, S., Lurmann, F., Cass, G., Alan Hansen, D., 1997. 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: study objectives and design. Proceedings of the 1996 U.S. EPA/A & WMA International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Solomon P.A., Magliano K.L. The 1995 integrated monitoring study (IMS95). study overview Atmospheric Environment. 33:1999;4747-4756.
16. 10 air quality study. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.