Effects of coworker information on perceptions and ratings of performance

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 1157-1173

  Thorsteinson, Todd J ^a,b   Balzer, William K ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033234889     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1157::AID-JOB947>3.0.CO;2-J     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1965). 'Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 394-400.
2. Anderson, N. H. (1967). 'Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 158-165.
3. Anderson, N. H. (1971). 'Integration theory and attitude change', Psychological Review, 78, 171-206.
4. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory, Academic Press, New York.
5. Balzer, W., Raymark, P., Weaver, M., Mattimore, K., Mattimore, L., Parker, T., Kruger, T., Hahn, S. and Gradwohl, W. (1992, May). Sources of Information Used by Raters when Appraising Performance. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
6. Balzer, W., Greguras, G., Ployhart, R., Irwin, J., Thorsteinson, T., O'Connor, G. and Roberts, D. (1996, April). Rater and Ratee Perspectives on Sources of Performance Information. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego.
7. Bernardin, H. J. and Walter, C. S. (1977). 'Effects of rater training and diary-keeping on psychometric error in ratings', Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 64-69.
8. Borman, W. C. (1974). 'The rating of individuals in organizations: an alternative approach', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105-124.
9. Borman, W. C. (1978). 'Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in job performance ratings', Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 135-144.
10. Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
11. Fiske, S. T. and Neuberg, S. L. (1990). 'A continuum of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation', In: Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (vol. 23, pp. 1-74). Academic Press, San Diego.
12. Harris, M. M. and Schaubroeck, J. (1988). 'A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings', Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
13. Hedge, J. W. and Borman, W. C. (1995). 'Changing conceptions and practices in performance appraisal', In: Howard, A. (Ed.), The Changing Nature of Work, pp. 451-481, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
14. Heneman, R. L. and Wexley, K. N. (1983). 'The effects of time delay in rating and amount of information observed on performance rating accuracy', Academy of Management Journal, 26, 677-686.
15. Ilgen, D. R. (1986). 'Laboratory research: A question of when, not if', In: Locke, E. A. (Ed.), Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
16. Kane, J. S. and Lawler, E. E., III. (1978). 'Methods of peer assessment', Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555-586.
17. Kashima, Y. and Kerekes, A. R. Z. (1994). 'A distributed memory model of averaging phenomena in person impression formation', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 407-455.
18. Kulik, C. T. and Ambrose, M. L. (1993). 'Category-based and feature-based processes in performance appraisal: integrating visual and computerized sources of performance data', Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 821-830.
19. London, M. and Beatty, R. W. (1993). '360-degree feedback as a competitive advantage', Human Resource Management, 32, 353-372.
20. London, M. and Smither, J. W. (1995). 'Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research', Personnel Psychology, 48, 803-840.
21. Mook, D. G. (1983). 'In defense of external invalidity', American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
22. Moses, J., Hollenbeck, G. P. and Sorcher, M. (1993). 'Other people's expectations', Human Resource Management, 32, 283-298.
23. Mount, M. K. (1984). 'Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance', Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
24. Murphy, K. R. and Cleveland, J. (1991). Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
25. Murphy, K. R. and Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-based Perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Murphy, K. R., Garcia, M., Kerkar, S., Martin, C. and Balzer, W. K. (1982). 'Relationship between observational accuracy and accuracy in evaluating performance', Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 320-325.
27. Raymark, P. H. (1993). Sources of Performance Information Used by Raters and the Effect of Indirect Performance Information on Rating Behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, OH.
28. Raymark, P. H., Balzer, W. K., Moore-Hirschl, S., DeLa Torre, F. and Woods, J. (1993, June). Empirical Investigation of the Dimensionality of Indirect Performance Information used by Raters. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, Chicago.
29. Runkel, P. J. and McGrath, J. E. (1972). Research on Human Behavior: a Systematic Guide to Method. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York.
30. Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S. and Fogli, L. (1988). 'Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance', Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482-486.