The organization of financial exchange markets: Theory and evidence

Journal of Financial Markets

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 329-357

  Pirrong, Craig ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Financial exchanges

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033227929     PISSN: 13864181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1386-4181(99)00005-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baumol, W., Panzar, J., Willig, R., 1982. In: Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
2. Brown, D., Zhang, Z., 1997. Market orders and market efficiency. Journal of Finance 52, 277-307.
3. Chung, K., Pruitt, S., 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management 23, 70-74.
4. Coase, R., 1988. In: The Firm, the Market, and the Law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Davis, L., Neal, L., 1998. Micro rules and macro outcomes: The impact of micro structure on the efficiency of security exchanges, London, New York, and Paris, 1800-1914. American Economic Review 88, 40-45.
6. Demsetz, H., 1968. Why regulate utilities. Journal of Law and Economics 11, 55-66.
7. Demsetz, H., 1989. In: Efficiency, Competition, and Policy. Blackwell, London.
8. Easterbrook, F., 1986. Monopoly, manipulation, and the regulation of futures markets. Journal of Business 59, S103-S128.
9. Edwards, L., Edwards, F., 1989. A legal and economic analysis of manipulation. Journal of Futures Markets 4, 333-366.
10. Fischel, D., Grossman, S., 1984. Consumer protection in futures and securities markets. Journal of Futures Markets 4, 273-295.
11. L. Glosten, 1994. Is the electronic limit order book inevitable? Journal of Finance 49, 1127-1161.
12. Lindenberg, E., Ross, S., 1981. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54, 1-33.
13. McInish, T., Wood, R., 1996. Competition, fragmentation, and market quality. In: Lo, A. (Ed.), The Industrial Organization of the Securities Industry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
14. Mulherin, H., Netter, J., Overdahl, J., 1991. Prices are property: The organization of financial exchanges from a transaction cost perspective. Journal of Law and Economics 34, 591-644.
15. Mulherin, H., Netter, J., Hersch, P., 1998. Merging Markets. Unpublished manuscript. Pennsylvania State University, College Station, PA.
16. D. Oesterle, D. Winslow, S. Anderson, 1992. The New York stock exchange and its outmoded specialist system: Can the exchange innovate to survive? Journal of Corporate Law 17, 223-310.
17. Pagano, M., 1989. Trading volume and asset liquidity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 255-274.
18. Perfect, S., Wiles, K., 1993. Alternative constructions of Tobin's q. Journal of Empirical Finance.
19. Pirrong, C., 1995a. The efficient scope of private transaction cost-reducing institutions: The case of commodity exchanges. Journal of Legal Studies 24.
20. Pirrong, C., 1995b. The self-regulation of commodity exchanges: The case of market manipulation. Journal of Law and Economics 38, 141-206.
21. Pirrong, C., 1999. A Positive Theory of Financial Exchange Organization and Governance. Unpublished manuscript. Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis.
22. Saloner, G., 1985. Self-regulating commodity futures exchanges. In: Anderson, R. (Ed.), The Industrial Organization of Futures Markets. Lexington, Boston.
23. Smirlock, M., Gilligan, T., Marshall, W., 1984. Tobin's Q and the structure-performance relationship. American Economic Review 74, 1051-1060.
24. Telser, L., 1978. In: Economic Theory and the Core. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Telser, L., Higinbotham, H., 1977. Organized futures markets: Costs and benefits. Journal of Political Economy 85, 969-997.
26. Telser, L., 1981. Why there are organized futures markets. Journal of Law and Economics 24, 1-22.