The effect of noise in a single-item localization and identification task

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 103, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 91-102

  Van Der Heijden, A H C ^a   Brouwer, R F T ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Identity and position; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; NOISE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033227653     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00025-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bloem, W., & Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Complete dependence of color identification upon color localization in a single-item task. Acta Psychologica, 89, 101-120.
2. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
3. Brouwer, R. F. T., & Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1997). Identity and position: Dependence originates from independence. Acta Psychologica, 95, 215-237.
4. Egly, R., & Homa, D. (1984). Sensitization of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 778-793.
5. Henderson, J. M. (1991). Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 91-106.
6. Henderson, J. M. (1996). Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 780-787.
7. Henderson, J. M., & Macquistan, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 221-230.
8. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725-737.
9. Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1987). Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 383-399.
10. Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037-1054.
11. Strangert, B., & Brännström, L. (1975). Spatial interaction effects in letter processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 268-272.
12. Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London, New York: Routledge.
13. Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Neerincx, M., & Wolters, G. (1989). Location cuing benefits with exposure duration variations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 35-38.
14. Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Schreuder, R., & Wolters, G. (1985). Enhancing single-item recognition accuracy by cuing spatial locations in vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37a, 427-434.
15. Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Wolters, G., & Brouwer, R. F. T. (1995). Response dependency and processing dependency of line orientation and position in a single-item task. Psychological Research, 58, 19-30.
16. Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Wolters, G., Fleur, E., & Hommels, J. G. M. (1992). Single-letter recognition accuracy benefits and position information. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 101-104.
17. Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Wolters, G., Groep, J. C., & Hagenaar, R. (1987). Single-letter recognition accuracy benefits from advance cuing of location. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 503-509.
18. Wolford, G., & Chambers, L. (1983). Lateral masking as a function of spacing. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 129-138.