Genetic line and major histocompatibility complex effects on primary and secondary antibody responses to T-dependent and T-independent antigens

Poultry Science

Volumn 78, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1518-1525

  Karaca, M ^a,b   Johnson, E ^a   Lamont, S J ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibody response; Curve parameters; Kinetics; Major histocompatibility complex; Quadratic equation

Indexed keywords

AVES; BRUCELLA; BRUCELLA MELITENSIS BIOVAR ABORTUS; OVIS ARIES;

ANTIBODY; ANTIGEN; BACTERIAL ANTIGEN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BRUCELLA ABORTUS; CHICKEN; ERYTHROCYTE; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; IMMUNOLOGY; KINETICS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; SHEEP; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; ANTIGENS; ANTIGENS, BACTERIAL; BRUCELLA ABORTUS; CHICKENS; ERYTHROCYTES; HAPLOTYPES; KINETICS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; SHEEP; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 0033227566     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/78.11.1518     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bacon, L. D., 1987. Influence of the MHC on disease resistance and productivity. Poultry Sci. 66:802-811.
2. Benjamini, E., and S. Leskowitz, 1991. Immunology: A Short Course. Wiley-Liss, New York, NY.
3. Dunnington, E. A., C. T. Larsen, W. G. Gross, and P. B. Siegel, 1992. Antibody response to combinations of antigens in white leghorn chickens to different background genomes and major histocompatibility complex genotypes. Poultry Sci. 71:1801-1806.
4. Haddad, E. E., N. B. Anthony, R. Bridges, C. Whitfill, J. K. Skeeles, and J. Thoma, 1994. Evaluation of the humoral immune response to different antigens in Arkansas regressor and progressor chickens. Poultry Sci. 73:341-345.
5. Kaufman, J. F., and S. J. Lamont, 1996. The chicken major histocompatibility complex. Pages 35-64 in: The Major Histocompatibility Complex in Domestic Animal Species. S. J. Lamont and L. B. Schook, eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Knudtson, K. L., and S. J. Lamont, 1989. Association of genetics and sampling time with the levels of interleukin-2 activity. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 22:333-343.
7. Kreukniet, M. B., and A. J. van der Zijpp, 1990. Effects of different doses of sheep erythrocytes on the humoral immuno response of chicken lines selected for high or low antibody production. Poultry Sci. 69:608-614.
8. LePage, K. T., S. E. Bloom, and R. L. Taylor, Jr., 1996. Antibody response to sheep red blood cells in a major histocompatibility (B) complex aneuploid line of chickens. Poultry Sci. 75:346-350.
9. Martin, A., W. B. Gross, and P. B. Siegel, 1989. IgG and IgM responses in high and low antibody selected lines of chickens. J. Hered. 80(3):249-251.
10. McCorkle, F., and B. Glick, 1980. The effect of aging on immune competence in the chicken. Antibody mediated immunity. Poultry Sci. 59:669-672.
11. Munns, P. L., and S. J. Lamont, 1991. Research note: Effects of age and immunization interval on the anamnestic response to T-cell-dependent and T-cell-independent antigens in chickens. Poultry Sci. 70:2371-2374.
12. Nordskog, A. W., and S. Cheng, 1988. Inbreeding effects on fertility and hatchability associated with the formation of sublines. Poultry Sci. 67:859-864.
13. Parmentier, H. K., M. Walraven, and M. B. Nieuwland, 1998. Antibody response and body weights of chicken lines selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red blood cells. 1. Effects of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Poultry Sci. 77:248-255.
14. Pevzner, I. Y., C. L. Trowbridge, and A. W. Nordskog, 1978. Recombination between genes coding for immuno response and the serologically determined antigens in the chicken B systems. Immunogenetics 7:25-33.
15. SAS, 1990. SAS® Language: Reference (Version 6). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
16. Scott, T. R., E. A. Dunnington, and P. B. Siegel, 1994. Brucella abortus antibody response of white leghorn chickens selected for high and low antibody responsiveness to sheep erythrocytes. Poultry Sci. 73:346-349.
17. Siegel, P. B., and W. B. Gross, 1980. Production and persistence of antibodies in chicken to sheep erythrocytes, 1. Directional selection. Poultry Sci. 59:1-5.
18. Siegel, H. S., H. L. Marks, and J. W. Latimer, 1984. Agglutinin response in Japanese quail selected for plasma cholesterol response to adrenocorticotropin and a model describing the dynamics of the response. Poultry Sci. 63:1892-1894.
19. Steadham, E. M., and S. J. Lamont, 1993. Gene complementation in biological crosses for humoral immunoresponse to Glutamic Acid-Alanine-Tyrosine. Poultry Sci. 72:76-81.
20. van der Zijpp, A. J., 1983. The effects of genetic origin, source of antigen and dose of antigen on the immune response of cockerels. Poultry Sci. 62:205-211.
21. van der Zijpp, A. J., K. Frankena, J. Boneschauster, and M.G.B. Nieuwland, 1983. Genetic analysis of primary and secondary immuno response in chickens. Poultry Sci. 62:565-572.
22. Weigend, S., N. Mielenz, and S. J. Lamont, 1997. Application of a nonlinear regression function to evaluate the kinetics of antibody response to vaccines in chicken lines divergently selected for multitrait immune response. Poultry Sci. 76:1248-1255.