R&D spending patterns of global firms

Research Technology Management

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 44-55

  Bowonder, B ^a,b,c,d   Yadav, S ^a  

^a ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF COLLEGE OF INDIA   (India)

^b Dept of Strat Mgmt of Technology ^*  (India)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^d U Nations Economic Commn Asia Pac   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; MARKETING; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

GLOBAL FIRMS; MARKET DYNAMICS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SPENDING;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0033226897     PISSN: 08956308     EISSN: None     Source Type: None    
DOI: 10.1080/08956308.1999.11671318     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. "Industrial Research Institute's R&D Trends Forecast for 1998." Research: Technology Management, 41(1998): pp. 16-20.
2. Dunning, J. H. and Pearce, R. D. The World's Largest Industrial Enterprises: 1962-1983, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985.
3. Narin, F. and Breitzman, A. "Inventive Productivity." Research Policy 24 (1995): pp. 507-519.
4. Narin, F. "Japan Technology: 50," mimeographed. Haddon Heights: CHI Research, 1986.
5. National Research Foundation. Research and Development in Industry: 1995-96. Arlington: National Science Foundation, 1998.
6. Albert, M.B. The New Innovators: Global Patenting Trends in Five Sectors. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1998, www.doc.gov
7. Granstrad, O., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. "Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have Distributed Rather Than Distinctive Core Competencies." California Management Review, 39 (1997): pp. 8-25.
8. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. "Large firms in the production of the world's technology: An important case of non-globalization." Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (1991): pp. 1-21.
9. Pavitt, K. "Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm." Industrial and Corporate Change, 7 (1998): pp. 433-452.
10. Kortum, S. and Lerner, J. "What is behind the recent surge in patenting?" Research Policy, 28 (1999): pp. 1-22.
11. Trajtenberg, M. "Innovation in Israel 1968-97: A Comparative Analysis Using Patent Data," mimeographed. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1999, www.nber.org/papers/w7022
12. Porter, M. and Stem, S. "International Study on Innovation," mimeographed, Geneva: World Economic Forum, 1999.
13. Office of Development, SIC codes, Missouri: University of Washington, 1995.
14. Kahn, J. "The Fortune Global 500." Fortune 138, No. 3 (1998): pp. 82-F42.
15. Company Reporting Ltd. "The UK R&D Scoreboard: 1998," London: Department of Trade and Industry, 1998.
16. Worldscope, Worldscope/Disclosure Partners, Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA 1998.
17. www.uspto.gov
18. Branscomb, L. M. "Does America Need A Technology Policy?" Harvard Business Review 70, No. 2 (1992): pp. 24-31.
19. Fleischer, M. and Liker, J. K. Concurrent Engineering Effectiveness. Cincinnati: Hansen Gardener, 1997.
20. Kodama, F. Emerging Patterns of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
21. Erhorn, C. and Stark, J. Competing by Design, Essex Junction: Omneo, 1994.
22. Mazzoleni, R. and Nelson, R. R. "Economic Theories About the Benefits and Costs of Patents." Journal of Economic Issues, 34 (1998): pp. 1031-1052.