A study of the validity of continuous doppler;Estudio de validez del Doppler continue

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 980-984

  Garzon F ^a   Gil Peralta, A ^a   Otero, A ^a   Crespo, P ^a   Saunas, E ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DEL ROCÍO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Carotid stenosis; Continuous doppler; Noninvasive test; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTINGENCY TABLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORBIT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 0033226426     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.2910.99090     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Wolf PA, Kännel WB, McGee DL. Epidemiology of strokes in North America. In Barnett HJ, Stein BM, Mohr JP, Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. p.19-29.
2. Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Warlow C. Prognosis of TIA in The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1990; 21: 848-53.
3. Hankey GJ, Slattery JM, Warlow C. Prognosis and prognostic factors of retinal infarction: a prospective cohort study. Br Med J 1991; 302: 499-504.
4. Ross JF, Deck JHN, Gotlieb A. Pathology of atherosclerotic plaques. In Smith RR, ed. Stroke and the extracranial vessels. New York: Raven Press; 1984. p. 23-37.
5. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445-53.
6. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC. European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337: 1235-43.
7. Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F, Weiss DG, Messina L, Hershey LA, et al. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. JAMA 1991; 266: 3289-94.
8. Moore W, Barnett H, Beebe H, Bernstein E, Brener B, Brott T, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Stroke 1995; 26: 188-201.
9. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421-8.
10. Hobson RW, Strandness F. Carotid artery stenosis: what's in the measurement? J Vase Surg 1993; 18: 1069-70.
11. Johnson G Jr. What's new in surgery: carotid endarterectomy. Am Coll Surg Bull 1994; 79: 87.
12. Gônzalez-Torres M. Exploraciones ultrasônicas de troncos supraôrticos en patologia vascular cerebral. Doppler continuo y eco-Doppler pulsado. En Martin R, Vâzquez J, eds. Ateromatosis carotidea y enfermedad vascular cerebral. Barcelona: Prous; 1991. p. 105-25.
13. Zwiebel WJ. A primer of cerebrovascular ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1987; 8: 2-57.
14. Chervu A, Moore WS. Carotid endarterectomy without arteriography. Ann Vase Surg 1994; 8: 296-302.
15. Dawson DL, Zierler RE, Strandness DE Jr, Clowes AW, Kohler TR. The role of duplex scanning and arteriography before carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study. J Vase Surg 1993; 18: 673-83.
16. Horn M, Michelini M, Greisler HP, Littooy FN, Baker WH. Carotid endarterectomy without arteriography. The preeminent role of the vascular laboratory. Ann Vase Surg 1994; 8: 221-4.
17. Geuder JW, Lamparello PJ, Riles TS, Giangola G, Imparato AM. Is duplex scanning sufficient evaluation before carotid endarterectomy? J Vase Surg 1989; 9: 193-201.
18. Kent KC, Kuntz KM, Patel MR, Kim D, Klufas RA, Whittemore AD, et al. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. JAMA 1995; 274: 888-93.
19. Liberopoulos K, Kaponis A, Kokkinis K, Pagratis N, Nicolakopoulou Z, Douskou M, et al. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease. Int Angiol 1995; 15: 131-7.
20. Satomura S. Study of flow patterns in peripheral arteries by ultrasonics. JCoustScoJap 1959; 15: 151.
21. Cerebral Embolism Task Force. Cardiogenic brain embolism: the second report of the Cerebral Embolism Task Force. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 727-43.
22. Srinivasan J, Mayberg MR, Weiss DG, Eskridge J. Duplex accuracy compared with angiography in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Trial for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Neurosurgery 1995; 36:648-54.
23. Feussner JR, Matchar DB. When and how to study the carotid arteries? Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 805-18.
24. Sillesen H, Bitsch Kr, Schroeder T, Steenberg HJ, Hansen L, Hansen HJ. Pulsed multigated Doppier ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carotid artery disease. Stroke 1988; 19: 846-51.
25. Hennerici M, Freund HJ. Efficacy of CW-Doppler and duplex system examinations for the evaluation of extracranial carotid disease. J Clin Ultrasound 1984; 12: 155-61.
26. Howard G, Chambless LE, Baker WH, Ricotta JJ, Jones AM, O'Leary D, et al. A multicenter validation study of Doppler ultrasound versus angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1991; 1: 166-73.
27. Harward TR, Bernstein EF, Fronek A. Continuous-wave versus range-gated pulsed Doppler power frequency spectrum analysis in the detection of carotid arterial occlusive disease. Ann Surg 1986; 204: 32-7.
28. Krause H, Segard M, Carey P. Doppler power frequency spectrum analysis in the diagnosis of carotid artery disease. Stroke 1984; 15: 351-8.
29. Blakeley DD, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V, Simel DL, Matchar DB. Noninvasive carotid artery testing. A meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 360-7.
30. Bomstein NM, Beloev ZG, Noms JW. The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound. Ann Surg 1988; 207: 315-7.
31. Gonzâlez-Torres M, Sâez Marcos AE. Ultrasonidos en patologia vascular cerebral. En Castillo J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Marti-Vilalta JL, eds. Manual de enfermedades vasculares cérébrales. Barcelona: Prous; 1995. p. 221-30.
32. Gil-Peralta A, Gonzâlez-Torres M. Doppler de troncos supraôrticos. En Arboix A, ed. Exploraciones complementarias en patologia vascular cerebral. Barcelona: Sociedad Espanola de Neurologia; 1992. p. 195-232.
33. Spencer MP. Frequency spectrum analysis in Doppler diagnosis. In Zwiebel WJ, eds. Introduction to vascular ultrasonography. Orlando: Grume and Straton Inc; 1986.
34. Burns PN. The physical principles of Doppler and spectral analysis. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15: 567-590.
35. Barnes RW, Wilson MR. Doppler ultrasound evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press; 1975.
36. Thiele BL, Jones AM, Hobson RW. Standards in noninvasive cerebrovascular testing: report from the Committee on Standards for Noninvasive Vascular Testing of the Joint Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vase Surg 1992; 15: 495-503.
37. Alexandrow AV, Brodie DS, McLean A, Hamilton P, Murphy J, Bums PN. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographie measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke 1997; 28: 33912.
38. Schwarte SW, Chanbless LE, Baker WH, Broderick JP, Howard G. Consistency of Doppler parameters predicting arteriographically confirmed carotid stenosis. Stroke 1997; 28: 343-7.
39. Spencer MP. Technique of Doppler examination. In Spencer MP, ed. Cerebrovascular evaluation with Doppler ultrasound. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Pub; 1981. p. 69-87.
40. Bridgers SL. Clinical correlates of Doppler/ultrasound errors in the detection of internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 1989; 20: 612-5.
41. Palmer A, Doménech JM. Introducciön al sistema SPSS/PC+. Anälisis de datos en Ciencias de la Salud. Barcelona: Grdficas Signo; 1988.
42. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1985.
43. Chiesa R, Melissano G. Three dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery surgery: a comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Surg 1993; 7: 171-6.
44. Wesbey GE, Bergan JJ. Cerebrovascular magnetic resonance angiography: a critical verification. J Vase Surg 1992; 16: 619-32.
45. Comeaux ME, Harkrider Color Doppler imaging versus angiography in near-total occlusion of the internal carotid artery. J Vase Tech 1994; 18:85-7.
46. Sullivan DC, Patterson RB. Artériographie pseudo-occlusion: duplex confirmation of patency. J Vase Tech 1990; 14: 235-8.
47. Cattin F, Weissert JP, Bonneville JF. Vasos del cuello. Ecografia acoplada al Doppler. En Jouve P, ed. Manual de ecografia general del adulto. Barcelona: Masson; 1995. p. 364-70.
48. Chikos P, Fisher L, Hirsch J, Thiele B, Strandness DJ. Observer variability in evaluating extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1983; 14: 885-92.
49. Flanigan DP, Schuler JJ, Vogel M, Borozan PG, Gray B, Sobonsky KR. The role of carotid artery duplex scanning in surgical decision making. J Vase Surg 1985; 2: 15-25.
50. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographie risk in mild Cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 1990; 21: 209-22.
51. Davies KM, Humphrey PR. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56: 967-72.
52. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ. Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 542-8.
53. Turner WH, Mûrie JA. IVDSA for extracranial carotid artery disease. BrJ Surg 1989; 76: 1247-50.
54. Barnett HJM, Eliasziw M, Meldrum HF. The identification by imaging methods of patients who might benefit from carotid endarterectomy. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 827-31.
55. Plainfosse MC, Mainardi C, Moretti JL. Técnicas Doppler: £c6mo deben emplearse? En Jouve P, ed. Manual de ecografia general del adulto. Barcelona: Masson; 1995. p. 25-36.
56. Vanninen R, Manninen H, Soimakallio S. Imaging of carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 1875-83.
57. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Symptomatic carotid ischémie events: safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectpmy. Br Med J 1990; 300: 1485-91.
58. Hachinski V. The issue is standards, not techniques. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 834.
59. Alexandrow AV, Vital D, Brodie DS, Hamilton P, Grotta JC. Grading carotid stenosis with ultrasound: an interlaboratory comparison. Stroke 1997; 28: 1208-10.
60. Kuntz KM, Polak JF, Whittemore AD, Skillman JJ, Kent KC. Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. Stroke 1997; 28: 597-602.
61. Howard G, Baker WH, Chambless LE, Howard VJ, Jones AM, Toole JF. An approach for the use of Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool for hemodynamically significant stenosis (despite heterogeneity of Doppler performance): a multicenter experience. Stroke 1996; 27: 1951-7.
62. Dâvalos A, Matias-Guiu J, Torrent O. Computed tomography in reversible ischémie attacks: clinical and prognostic correlations in a prospective study. J Neurol 1988; 235: 155-8.
63. Kapelle LJ, Latum JC, Koustaal PJ, van Gojn J. Transient ischémie attacks and small-vessel disease. Lancet 1991; 337: 339-41.
64. Faught WE, Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS. Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: new velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for theshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vase Surg 1994; 19: 818-28.
65. Zwiebel WJ. Duplex sonography of the cerebral arteries: efficacy, limitations and indications. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 29-36.
66. Worthy SA, Henderson J, Griffiths PD, Oates CP, Gholkar A. The role of duplex sonography and angiography in the investigation of carotid artery disease. Neuroradiology 1997; 39: 122-6.